Re: [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?

gang Antgam <antgamgang@gmail.com> Mon, 02 August 2021 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <antgamgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 111attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B233A1F30; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zpdv4jLhEsMO; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A433A1DEE; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 15:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id v20so12513512eda.1; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y/wDFkcEUDgT40Nkmo2CxgmGVqbaw1jG5oT6unTmfe4=; b=atcfozWRj/nk/BJA9DvmNErpHTpbNv78SE00ypRGEBspp79/uL4t42X2Bhj7Os9nXZ 66c/U8MDJaBZxj8Hd4rFH31hO959R158/gXHycvmCg4ksZ+muTrriapzV/TKeMZCBFLK Bw3auSbWo/nbFShVLbWE4XC3ls4VHlR1j+ZW9qweJOzGtIZsA3YdyfxcNMWp6MZe4GI+ SX50hGARf25aii4LGco+Fh+bhKQ8ILcZfdR3ldLxKU95JVQ20C165y457fiPrZGVqcxu uHLfhGPq/bB/LuX8VtUdCdNxVqbslQYhWZxa5fziAskpf7Rr4xQbNe7kDb++ql2U5O7+ TrPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y/wDFkcEUDgT40Nkmo2CxgmGVqbaw1jG5oT6unTmfe4=; b=j7IzBYbCLDpz9xiwqtYonwAcVtfzOG5N5nPdXWNPbgOzk3CFN18fYwBA1uZ3df8pKq PdcReaHnNfStPwDDIUGVu/VElwSQNn+m0hu+pvCZNaqis2FoU0SrLk3QMNkJWXlvA265 L3Lc+t5yeM/JSV/wJftSmt4E4YHi8JkuWAoBbA9z5wdFZgUnAbr4nCSKcabDQ/tzaTyf jSP+/RKJrtUq3ruAnIUGBEueysHV7kHN2sVI0v2TFlO1eD99Zz7BZs0hcVGxlfcEq43C Er6lmwHSba/ZxoBIIA5gO0Lh9NPiSbWlvclosU8gKHfSP5RM+odppFmlifxv+UJeDduw 4rgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533T+6kwTEEGfgSeeUGwpfVcQhSI/qx1o+IrMHwpx/cz11wz/Xov o7rXUk020cgncfPlyv+jGD3saGGZ6KwejIMCxyo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznBvp8QyPpieOD1LEA55hFeRKBRwa+Zjv0wgbPIOMPfNZht14lLsk3Hs/ctFuOh72ryCNVtKpRS83T7iO/DzM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1e96:: with SMTP id f22mr16223993edf.189.1627943190200; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 15:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8a1018d3-62da-a740-72d6-bb370af71a9e@joelhalpern.com> <20210731193455.C04E625657CF@ary.qy> <7A01A718-246F-4DFD-B522-EC4D7C945199@akamai.com> <72755DA5-56E8-4DF9-A2B6-2BBDD315094A@tzi.org> <daaf0898-fcaf-341b-a710-9c459edebdc1@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <daaf0898-fcaf-341b-a710-9c459edebdc1@cs.tcd.ie>
From: gang Antgam <antgamgang@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:56:18 +0430
Message-ID: <CA+d13g3E3dcbRmqhWz_bxv-nioCHyp9i+_7KrbzJTOsk0TdzpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Tools Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>, 111attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009105a105c89b0fbc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/111attendees/eX7UbwEYj3jb24QpbnGTk7M1emA>
Subject: Re: [111attendees] Why do we allow people to edit CodiMD meeting notes who are not logged in?
X-BeenThere: 111attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for IETF 111 attendees <111attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/111attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:111attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees>, <mailto:111attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 22:26:51 -0000

در تاریخ دوشنبه ۲ اوت ۲۰۲۱،‏ ۰:۵۳ Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
نوشت:

>
>
> On 01/08/2021 16:47, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> > OK, so the summary of the 111attendees discussion is that we don’t
> > want unauthenticated write access to meeting notes.
> Really? Seems to me the risk isn't significant enough to make
> someone do work and there's plenty of opportunity to read the
> draft meeting notes. I don't really object to requiring note
> takers be authenticated but it doesn't seem that worthwhile.
>
> S.
> --
> 111attendees mailing list
> 111attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/111attendees
>