IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adoption of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Tue, 24 March 2015 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8471A8A17 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BG7uY0dh2mYR for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BA31A8A09 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oifl3 with SMTP id l3so260684oif.0 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4pcTXa9Hxr6zliSDfR5IT6Sz28TLMUYEqbSYPTkLn5E=; b=Uz0ajBcQp3wFOxWX+IDvyL4h3bpH0m/16I/sTdjHXDX+Gqbn51I9at6jFF8xwd8b2n rwGrdJaLvNBEr9FZh/oXPrUotb98X0NgOXBez8uDDVJPWVslArajjPW0eh7yZnAw4hsS CR8rFVjxTs7b7FjHb8KaU/yX0yq+IV60gR3nRSopCh6AhsqCHe+3lq+gFipK0eVKHbSX +nfL+yoEZlYOMvWyPu6kWYUTA7ozElsSF7qny98QsUzbGmwUrV+k95uOBskcpiPaJ8yD BHxKBS5C40Q2KcfqE9LnG/0PwNNSjfPoXkbTWxguTihmlgc2/7TZLSgJ2nKh5i2H+k5W /ABg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.42.171 with SMTP id p11mr4224357oel.41.1427218920788; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: robert.cragie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.80.18 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55117DA9.8020806@innovationslab.net>
References: <CADrU+dKjuOOCyhsN=gyqijJqkz+gzRTLo+Bp1mXpe8pMuLAhKg@mail.gmail.com> <20869.1427209101@sandelman.ca> <55117DA9.8020806@innovationslab.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:42:00 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GncadPwT4bkx7cSNpqeV0MPqPrQ
Message-ID: <CADrU+dKRcy_D=FjoJ-bcTiscqtYzwy=tzujX-Fokuyo3zbpZLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c24b14ca575605120c4ceb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/MXQ-sicVh-vb_B3rtSuKblc809Y>
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adoption of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:42:03 -0000

There are no restrictions from the ZigBee Alliance as the assumption was
this would end up being an RFC.

Robert

On 24 March 2015 at 15:07, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:

> Just a couple of observations...
>
> On 3/24/15 4:58 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >
> > Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> wrote:
> >     > MLE is used in ZigBee IP and other 802.15.4-based mesh networks
> and it
> >     > is important that it can be progressed to be an RFC. It was
> originally
> >     > going to be an AD-sponsored draft due to the 6lowpan WG ending but
> due
> >     > to changes in ADs this is no longer possible.
> >
> > Is Zigbee actually willing to let the 6lo WG own the protocol?
> > Could the WG actually change the protocol in any significant,
> > changes-on-the-wire way?
>
> The last version of the draft (-06) contains no disclaimers about
> restrictions on the spec.  It also carries the standard I-D Copyright
> statement.
>
> And if it helps, there do not appear to be any IPR disclosures filed
> against the draft.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> 6lo@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email