IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adoption of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Tue, 24 March 2015 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE741A0140 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nr8mS9ZkHUht for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83AB01A007C for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiag65 with SMTP id g65so5258985oia.2 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TMIkWGamgtpEapsL6uePOIFdySWxxWtDSSWrcNu22HY=; b=DMUhmvx861WXNvaJhx/Wn0rmLVVa2nvlx1jtOopBPD5uOIMe1EFWIFEQeX0dI+I5Ve YejHJ8hqCDF9DXQmCdvd5PjGaO4/sfg6PMbgIPNLpc0zL/dKPx68vXo9s/bVtqLvFs/K zMMh0MdNBOJwltzqhhUaGicILummSrMBUyvDiuYHPX3Dk2MS26WXYAAR9b99iGjaI5ic ESei3rnYn67K3kj/Y7NOjYOvDxSPwZnSSFsVDOd9LRQsVC1uGLfxuVamEkNW3apMxSSq 8g1JLYvNFmCmlBv8NtGGa0VYMgchXAN03SG/73/Vk0reQDF2T46VT67soquB/EzJGvOc w2Gg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.116.130 with SMTP id jw2mr4922738obb.48.1427231842976; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: robert.cragie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.80.18 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20869.1427209101@sandelman.ca>
References: <CADrU+dKjuOOCyhsN=gyqijJqkz+gzRTLo+Bp1mXpe8pMuLAhKg@mail.gmail.com> <20869.1427209101@sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:17:22 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: JuCGMaqrM7ZXi-K34wEHvzHGhAo
Message-ID: <CADrU+dKTDru_=0C=S1KQE9W6kmwtm7T69RrAZ5pHetQ726hA-A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c5d240348f905120f4f01"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/XM4-E3VuOE0aDme1X081DP-j0a4>
Cc: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adoption of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:17:24 -0000

>
> Is Zigbee actually willing to let the 6lo WG own the protocol?
> Could the WG actually change the protocol in any significant,
> changes-on-the-wire way?
>

<RCC>The WG could potentially extend MLE with additional documents but the
aim is to move the document to RFC status as is</RCC>

>
> I think that if it can't go AD-sponsored, and that I think I know the
> answers
> to my questions, and given that I think that the UDP port has already been
> allocated, it should just go via Independant Stream.
>
> I didn't know that MLE had not made it into the RFC-editor queue.
>

<RCC>Thanks for the pointer - let's talk offline</RCC>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email