IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Adoption of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Tue, 24 March 2015 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0061A87E0 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bfWcjJJLzIJL for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7084D1A8828 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F2488124 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b48f.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:5558:4ef9:e5c4:3a8d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0461368239 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55117DA9.8020806@innovationslab.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 05:07:21 -1000
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 6lo@ietf.org
References: <CADrU+dKjuOOCyhsN=gyqijJqkz+gzRTLo+Bp1mXpe8pMuLAhKg@mail.gmail.com> <20869.1427209101@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20869.1427209101@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rLal9EdRa9WVhPquTnrOSTWxE6KcMhcki"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/SeLhRz0TXHbx690q-KaA_8PYjek>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Adoption of draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:07:36 -0000

Just a couple of observations...

On 3/24/15 4:58 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> wrote:
>     > MLE is used in ZigBee IP and other 802.15.4-based mesh networks and it
>     > is important that it can be progressed to be an RFC. It was originally
>     > going to be an AD-sponsored draft due to the 6lowpan WG ending but due
>     > to changes in ADs this is no longer possible.
> 
> Is Zigbee actually willing to let the 6lo WG own the protocol?
> Could the WG actually change the protocol in any significant,
> changes-on-the-wire way?

The last version of the draft (-06) contains no disclaimers about
restrictions on the spec.  It also carries the standard I-D Copyright
statement.

And if it helps, there do not appear to be any IPR disclosures filed
against the draft.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email