Re: [6lo] draft-chairs-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-00.txt

Jonathan Hui <jonhui@nestlabs.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jonhui@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11DF1A0378 for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jBVwv_HTRyEk for <6lo@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x229.google.com (mail-yk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC6F01A004C for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykfw194 with SMTP id w194so3931858ykf.0 for <6lo@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nestlabs.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pYjPEXMj8cok3Q0r0ok9o9H5xW5kAZAu5Jgaf2hbCmE=; b=lgVSmegapssJN7vruPTFj+wcSfsthcXQNdqCosKMRF3Md5H9b8cgg+hdIwEKie8xs5 73ZuyxK3EVWkB2leY4i1gKxGivkK3MGaGEj7ORW14X5CF6tdoNjfLBvA5htukNQaGaTk BpLifnQcxWuE6imDvBlMRnDSeFDW2/yKnRKgg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pYjPEXMj8cok3Q0r0ok9o9H5xW5kAZAu5Jgaf2hbCmE=; b=G0yk9Z6EFmf6eOAKJJVfX8TMIbp8y1QormtDFZynEq+p3/+Cf/hBum6xeb0dPDf0V4 BBUdpR3bhdvZkDTWfWK7Ukix5tv0oNtLX4+CPz/jkMuNlFRyS5JJnixr4aMBEL07xwUQ MvR7vMB+FRKrs/3d/f71acFCzRRH75uUnJs2zQli6K3ZmFYOQyrVfTvdHVlao0yIwqwz PLyKqVKiq9N2Bw7VshIeFr8XIZ+H2aB1SUK+pXk6v0qlZOJZyr6jOBtpThw1nY4/p7M3 pZIcc84NHNSpu89iY+dZa5JGSPFW8cMheF+g2Aca4EdB4LUCQvVAlS/XYZ2E5niQqD5g yZSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4BTs4Ih8Oc/MWlGD4xdn39hQ2n2yiefeLWsD1LxxtuQPEst+Inu6yqNE7Kxys4SZVldxT
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.84.215 with SMTP id b206mr11049399yka.21.1437684837038; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.207.75 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849F48E31@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C39990C@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <CAO6tK45NVtbN4gON+fcQA=xzzV0Wd00Jqgo78i6LP5QV_j71Sg@mail.gmail.com> <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C39B48B@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <CAO6tK474ga37g29Ope8XxsPB67iBpsSAsPhXqXfMcyvCm6_+xg@mail.gmail.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849F0A949@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F02222FBA1@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849F47890@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <CAO6tK45Et-A1pRJKRbPz5d4UD4zUcrWuTy=A8L+FZj78kfrVog@mail.gmail.com> <BF00A164-EE85-442C-A9AE-7FE7FA769CDD@cisco.com> <CAO6tK44p6qjze5iR-KYg=5odvRoMEa71n51mrY_pGc2ZaxSxOw@mail.gmail.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849F48BE1@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <CAO6tK47Z7sPtpN3cRS6w=PRJ6Sdh65Bv6dV1fC+z4O36dvH_Jg@mail.gmail.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD849F48E31@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:53:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO6tK44UBh6Ks=MOd14+o5pKJMVBrdqmTKXbm_vQnNQnN41Wcg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Hui <jonhui@nestlabs.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a74ac02f447051b911693"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/YfXcNTIg-_BiYgmVDStCmHJa_xE>
Cc: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lo] draft-chairs-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:53:58 -0000

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> For example, only define two types of headers (elective and critical) and
> only use a single bit to distinguish between them.  Then cast everything
> (including RFC 4944 and RFC 6282) within those headers.  For example, don't
> bother to reserve 00xxxxxx for something else.
>
>
>
> Ø    Why bother casting 4944 stuff? It is already on page one. Could you
> clarify?
>
What if I want to use the same 6loRH header to source route individual 6lo
fragments?  Yes, doing so incurs the overhead of source routing on each
fragment, but then there is no need to reassemble at every hop and allows
sending fragments along different paths.

--
Jonathan Hui