IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lo] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Mon, 06 January 2020 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lo@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34BC120122; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 05:45:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfDJqTEqJ7w6; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 05:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7496120052; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 05:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 006DZvHd021085; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 08:45:05 -0500
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2xb9474rp4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 06 Jan 2020 08:45:05 -0500
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 006Dj38W053924; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 07:45:04 -0600
Received: from zlp30495.vci.att.com (zlp30495.vci.att.com [135.46.181.158]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 006Diw4g053786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Jan 2020 07:44:59 -0600
Received: from zlp30495.vci.att.com (zlp30495.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30495.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id E92C34005C3A; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 13:44:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.1.46]) by zlp30495.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id BEF404005C2B; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 13:44:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 006DiwOS005890; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 07:44:58 -0600
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.178.11]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 006DiqkX005542; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 07:44:52 -0600
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas1.research.att.com [135.207.255.86]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF8DF1DDF; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 08:44:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njmtcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::e881:676b:51b6:905d%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 08:44:51 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd.all@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12
Thread-Index: AQHVxH2s0vKLgafqMU2uDkHTGgKUzKfdpJjQ
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 13:44:50 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CFA6F1423A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <157782256205.23374.9622379609196664427@ietfa.amsl.com> <MN2PR11MB35658578D4852C13AA51D13DD83C0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35658578D4852C13AA51D13DD83C0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [69.141.203.172]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-06_04:2020-01-06,2020-01-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001060125
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/mVdVlAZEM1IxRr90XC3V9KnrWsg>
Subject: Re: [6lo] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12
X-BeenThere: 6lo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for the 6lo WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks." <6lo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6lo/>
List-Post: <mailto:6lo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo>, <mailto:6lo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 13:45:09 -0000

Hi Pascal,

Brief responses below, [acm] tag,

thanks for your reply,
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) [mailto:pthubert@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 5:39 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com>; ops-dir@ietf.org
> Cc: last-call@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd.all@ietf.org; 6lo@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12
> 
> Hello Al
> 
> Many  thanks for your review!
> 
> Please see below:
> 
> > This is the OPS-DIR review of -12
> > 1)  "This specification introduces a new token called a cryptographic
> >    identifier (Crypto-ID) that is used to prove indirectly the ownership
> >    of an address that is being registered by means of [RFC8505]."
> > during Neighbor Discovery in
> >   "...a 6LoWPAN Low Power Lossy
> >    Network (LLN), typically a stub network connected to a larger IP
> >    network via a Border Router called a 6LBR per [RFC6775]."
> 
> Unsure what you expectation is here?
> I removed the redefinition of LLN in the latter piece.
[acm] 
No real expectation, I was adding background to the review...
> 
> 
> 
> > 2) This seems like a worthwhile update to RFC8505.
> >      The section describing the Update aspect is helpful, but ...
> >      Nit: there should also a sentence in the Abstract indicating the
> Update
> > status.
> >      The scope of operation is very limited, hence no operational issues
> detected.
> 
> The first sentence of the abstract says "
> This document specifies an extension to 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery (ND)
> protocol defined in RFC6775 and updated in RFC8505.
> "
> Should we reword ? Maybe "
> This document updates the 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol defined
> in RFC 6775 and RFC 8505.
> "
> ?
[acm] 
Yes, I think that works, it must be clear that you are Updating 8505 
in this memo. There's a requirement to do this when "Updating" (somewhere).

> 
> 
> > 3) The SEC-DIR review will likely be more interesting: this reviewer's
> experience
> >     doesn't foster review of LLN in any depth.
> 
> It is happening right now  : )
> 
> > 4) The Doc Shepherd's form indicates that the last 4 versions benefited
> from
> > review by
> >     knowledgeable persons in the Security Area.
> 
> Yes, that helped a lot make the SEC DIR review smoother.
> 
> Many thanks again
[acm] 
You're very welcome 

> 
> Pascal
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email