Re: [6lo] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

All good then!

Again, many thanks.

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[e-mail]>
> Sent: lundi 6 janvier 2020 14:45
> To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12
> 
> Hi Pascal,
> 
> Brief responses below, [acm] tag,
> 
> thanks for your reply,
> Al
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 5:39 AM
> > To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]
> > Subject: RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-ap-nd-12
> >
> > Hello Al
> >
> > Many  thanks for your review!
> >
> > Please see below:
> >
> > > This is the OPS-DIR review of -12
> > > 1)  "This specification introduces a new token called a cryptographic
> > >    identifier (Crypto-ID) that is used to prove indirectly the ownership
> > >    of an address that is being registered by means of [RFC8505]."
> > > during Neighbor Discovery in
> > >   "...a 6LoWPAN Low Power Lossy
> > >    Network (LLN), typically a stub network connected to a larger IP
> > >    network via a Border Router called a 6LBR per [RFC6775]."
> >
> > Unsure what you expectation is here?
> > I removed the redefinition of LLN in the latter piece.
> [acm]
> No real expectation, I was adding background to the review...
> >
> >
> >
> > > 2) This seems like a worthwhile update to RFC8505.
> > >      The section describing the Update aspect is helpful, but ...
> > >      Nit: there should also a sentence in the Abstract indicating
> > > the
> > Update
> > > status.
> > >      The scope of operation is very limited, hence no operational
> > > issues
> > detected.
> >
> > The first sentence of the abstract says "
> > This document specifies an extension to 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery
> > (ND) protocol defined in RFC6775 and updated in RFC8505.
> > "
> > Should we reword ? Maybe "
> > This document updates the 6LoWPAN Neighbor Discovery (ND) protocol
> > defined in RFC 6775 and RFC 8505.
> > "
> > ?
> [acm]
> Yes, I think that works, it must be clear that you are Updating 8505 in this
> memo. There's a requirement to do this when "Updating" (somewhere).
> 
> >
> >
> > > 3) The SEC-DIR review will likely be more interesting: this
> > > reviewer's
> > experience
> > >     doesn't foster review of LLN in any depth.
> >
> > It is happening right now  : )
> >
> > > 4) The Doc Shepherd's form indicates that the last 4 versions
> > > benefited
> > from
> > > review by
> > >     knowledgeable persons in the Security Area.
> >
> > Yes, that helped a lot make the SEC DIR review smoother.
> >
> > Many thanks again
> [acm]
> You're very welcome
> 
> >
> > Pascal
> >