Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor
Mathieu Goessens <mathieu.goessens@irisa.fr> Fri, 25 March 2011 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mathieu.goessens@irisa.fr>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CCA3A684D; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuh-1w+UMRSl; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AD63A684B; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,245,1299452400"; d="scan'208";a="79106844"
Received: from unknown (HELO [78.251.233.146]) ([78.251.233.146]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA; 25 Mar 2011 21:32:55 +0100
Message-ID: <4D8CFBEB.3010304@irisa.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:32:43 +0100
From: Mathieu Goessens <mathieu.goessens@irisa.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101030 Icedove/3.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <4D8CCFBC.9030909@irisa.fr> <3B1740F1-6CFB-4D93-BE63-C34CD8DFDA70@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <3B1740F1-6CFB-4D93-BE63-C34CD8DFDA70@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:31:23 -0000
On 25/03/2011 20:12, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote: > > >> Hi folks, >> >> The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by tools.ietf.org and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org. >> >> The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt >> >> Do you know what is the problem ? Document generation problem ? Where it should be reported ? >> > > These two documents were clearly derived from very different sources: the page breaks are also quite different. > > How on earth did that happen I am not that sure: the page break is different precisely starting from this figure. I was more thinking about a different version of configuration of the xml2rfc software. Regards, -- Mathieu Goessens IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France Tel: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 00, Fax: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 71
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Paul Hoffman
- [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as distribu… Mathieu Goessens
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Mathieu Goessens
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Mathieu Goessens
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… RFC Editor