Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor

[Copying the RFC Editor to let them also check their records]

Note that the IANA registry is consistent with
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Mathieu Goessens
> Sent: 25 March 2011 21:33
> To: Paul Hoffman
> Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and
> datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor
> 
> On 25/03/2011 20:12, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by
tools.ietf.org
> and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org.
> >>
> >> The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version:
> >>
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
> >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
> >>
> >> Do you know what is the problem ? Document generation problem ? Where it
> should be reported ?
> >>
> >
> > These two documents were clearly derived from very different sources: the
> page breaks are also quite different.
> >
> > How on earth did that happen
> I am not that sure: the page break is different precisely starting from
> this figure.
> 
> I was more thinking about a different version of configuration of the
> xml2rfc software.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Mathieu Goessens
> IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
> Tel: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 00, Fax: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 71
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf