IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowpan] MIB and SNMP (was: ND and MAC-level security)

Hamid Mukhtar <hamid@etri.re.kr> Thu, 11 June 2009 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <hamid.mukhtar@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1912128C16F for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmp9Y7VRBaeI for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A0728C175 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so695434ana.4 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bd2Bhu5h7YyESyvGeOLcFxpHAB2CBnNdFhZZB6fWMj8=; b=qM0ikMnH1E4EhntTMBc3lxGhHfD2FXMhBekancAVRNlFELLPUHDCdmcX2qzJHQB9bE 5uO5mQPQI8taKTpqqV9xLWwZNhvbdVyn+AkxZdqza7nfJTC/LtbZzbj12X8s8VRclGjw icr7RXFsCCuIgrCrpr4YC25NHNjgyata+3m8M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=e3zOrI7IgyfWqUrCbzXQjJ5XlhEwab20ZSL57bhzxl8FOrMbML8pRCdEtlzq7VI/w3 NX4u8+rfeQzHW6q7D96Uz2rr8NTtYsdu9PS6bCFbkqQ+1s3qrh1cJPlhtWXKoREzL2fb ZjsTlozLvvsYPI2y7RkfrxN8s2tJnl61ehOYU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: hamid.mukhtar@gmail.com
Received: by 10.100.127.4 with SMTP id z4mr2590517anc.129.1244715756081; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A30D807.9000309@gmail.com>
References: <4A1DC4DF.6090009@sensinode.com> <87prddqhgu.fsf@kelsey-ws.hq.ember.com> <4A2F3A29.2010203@jennic.com> <8E9C227490A7614B87D90C0AE18CF22CB8C9554397@NLCLUEXM06.connect1.local> <839BB7C6-9CB5-46E4-ACFA-A179ECA5FEBD@tzi.org> <e9a260f20906101631l424440a5j935a8b02245e7fdb@mail.gmail.com> <7b191a110906101815v7425e24ck33007b87c1027de1@mail.gmail.com> <4A30C6CC.4070009@gmail.com> <e9a260f20906110232x70b0c41k388374a0d12d289f@mail.gmail.com> <4A30D807.9000309@gmail.com>
From: Hamid Mukhtar <hamid@etri.re.kr>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:22:21 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 82052bee0bc2af29
Message-ID: <e9a260f20906110322v1565eabes10fd39dc0195fb39@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "6lowpan@ietf.org" <6lowpan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] MIB and SNMP (was: ND and MAC-level security)
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:22:32 -0000

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Alexandru
Petrescu<alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hamid Mukhtar a écrit :
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Alexandru
>> Petrescu<alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Brian Frank a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> I think an UDP-based application level protocol that works well
>>>> over 6LoWPANs and with sleeping nodes is a sorely lacking
>>>> feature.  However, I am not sure SNMP is the best starting point.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a MIB (Management Information Base) effort for 6LoWPAN ND?
>>> It may be too early... but MIB is necessary.
>>>
>>
>> 6LoWPAN MIB has already been there for a while.
>
> Do you mean draft-daniel-6lowpan-mib-00.txt?
>
> It doesn't seem to be in the list of WG items:
>

Ya I was referring to the same draft which certainly isnt a working group item.
The working group isnt chartered for network management yet.
However, the draft may be considered as an interesting item once the
group recharters.

>> The document name you specified, "draft-ietf-6lowpan", matched multiple
>> documents:
>>
>>    sort by date sort by name
>>
>>    04 Apr 2007  draft-ietf-6lowpan-format
>>    08 Dec 2008  draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc
>>    27 May 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd
>>    02 Mar 2007  draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem
>>    25 Mar 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements
>>    09 Mar 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases
>>
>>    Found 6 matches.
>
> The 6LoWPAN Charter doesn't seem to mention it either.
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email