Re: [6lowpan] MIB and SNMP (was: ND and MAC-level security)

Ki-Hyung Kim (김기형) <kkim86@gmail.com> Sun, 14 June 2009 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kkim86@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBF03A6BAD for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.985
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WAsO2Ub7q5x3 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f214.google.com (mail-gx0-f214.google.com [209.85.217.214]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554223A6ADF for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk10 with SMTP id 10so5402872gxk.13 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=JOhphCPF2Re2O9PanNou9UOqZfNnlgbiMoVkVh7E2Sw=; b=bia0ljbLAMEIBDYnV8e+OJWILXZgM7Qkzo7qRFvJ/xYdOgJbpooUPYoDjyPe1h+Aiy eYmT1FsvWO2Kd0FNnqRD32e4e1cINI9VTLKyx/VzQanZJRfD8Syaf3HiBma0h4r9vbcH SEeonNyRQXTi6q7NPzZ37QlHmIxYGLKHSJG90=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=lA/RAWIfz35b0e0Q0szwzZd0EB2Ohi0ZXc64JImZsPvSWPoKopwIa0OTV8oNljzUcK eXSuygwClLzYZrW3NP6nlSj5fXH9P2L8qkekkHmvBJynRSmx0ynOMy2sy01I5Qo7QJST sEgGdheT0/QhBu9xu4nWbHbFVNjyhl/+390UQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.38.19 with SMTP id q19mr10918359ybj.76.1244969805121; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A30D807.9000309@gmail.com>
References: <4A1DC4DF.6090009@sensinode.com> <87prddqhgu.fsf@kelsey-ws.hq.ember.com> <4A2F3A29.2010203@jennic.com> <8E9C227490A7614B87D90C0AE18CF22CB8C9554397@NLCLUEXM06.connect1.local> <839BB7C6-9CB5-46E4-ACFA-A179ECA5FEBD@tzi.org> <e9a260f20906101631l424440a5j935a8b02245e7fdb@mail.gmail.com> <7b191a110906101815v7425e24ck33007b87c1027de1@mail.gmail.com> <4A30C6CC.4070009@gmail.com> <e9a260f20906110232x70b0c41k388374a0d12d289f@mail.gmail.com> <4A30D807.9000309@gmail.com>
From: "Ki-Hyung Kim (김기형)" <kkim86@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:56:25 +0900
Message-ID: <d8bf2bf30906140156h719d3fcbp3a4e80ece0a3d2af@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001517511008fd8bc9046c4b1ea0"
Cc: Hamid Mukhtar <hamid@etri.re.kr>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "6lowpan@ietf.org" <6lowpan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] MIB and SNMP (was: ND and MAC-level security)
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:56:38 -0000

As Alex mentioned, I think it is a right time to discuss the 6lowpan MIB as
a WG item.
I want to ask for a working group consensus on this.

__
Ki-Hyung Kim
Associate Professor, Ajou University, Korea,
Tel: +82-31-219-2433, Cel: +82-10-4760-2551


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 19:10, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hamid Mukhtar a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Alexandru Petrescu<
>> alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Brian Frank a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I think an UDP-based application level protocol that works well
>>>> over 6LoWPANs and with sleeping nodes is a sorely lacking
>>>> feature.  However, I am not sure SNMP is the best starting point.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Is there a MIB (Management Information Base) effort for 6LoWPAN ND?
>>> It may be too early... but MIB is necessary.
>>>
>>>
>> 6LoWPAN MIB has already been there for a while.
>>
>
> Do you mean draft-daniel-6lowpan-mib-00.txt?
>
> It doesn't seem to be in the list of WG items:
>
>  The document name you specified, "draft-ietf-6lowpan", matched multiple
>> documents:
>>
>>    sort by date sort by name
>>
>>    04 Apr 2007  draft-ietf-6lowpan-format
>>    08 Dec 2008  draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc
>>    27 May 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd
>>    02 Mar 2007  draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem
>>    25 Mar 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements
>>    09 Mar 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases
>>
>>    Found 6 matches.
>>
>
> The 6LoWPAN Charter doesn't seem to mention it either.
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>