Re: [6lowpan] Question about RA packets

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 09 March 2012 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C58221F86B9 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:27:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ow9B9+BXi0SK for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:27:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E7121F86AF for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:27:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q29FRMll014495; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:27:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.117] (p5B3E6A4A.dip.t-dialin.net [91.62.106.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCFBE7AC; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:27:21 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F6E4BBE7-7593-431C-A46D-F77770A8262F@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:27:19 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <00539C06-F953-4EAF-A54D-7CD2995A24CA@tzi.org>
References: <F6E4BBE7-7593-431C-A46D-F77770A8262F@gmail.com>
To: Damien Roth <d42roth@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Question about RA packets
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:27:31 -0000

On Mar 9, 2012, at 15:51, Damien Roth wrote:

> Is my reasoning correct ?

I didn't check the numbers, but they sound about right.

Can you give me a sample packet (preferably in pcap form)?
I would like to check how much draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-03.txt improves the situation.

Grüße, Carsten