IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] Comment to draft-wang-6tisch-6top-coapie-01.txt

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Fri, 25 September 2015 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7D41B30AD for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hs-57qqfRNoo for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6461B30B9 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 05:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.15.1/8.14.8) with ESMTPS id t8PC0maY000268 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:00:48 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.acr.fi (8.15.1/8.14.8/Submit) id t8PC0mQ1013545; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:00:48 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22021.14192.385465.57972@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:00:48 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA-n9jtP1P75zhP0TyCPiHOoFb0z9EKbM0tHYaHKaAHjnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <21934.16929.897976.905775@fireball.acr.fi> <50838770.1280677.1437661723389.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CADJ9OA-n9jtP1P75zhP0TyCPiHOoFb0z9EKbM0tHYaHKaAHjnA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 5 min
X-Total-Time: 4 min
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/-l-C-9FPVoEjc45LaupkKEEaS20>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Comment to draft-wang-6tisch-6top-coapie-01.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:01:01 -0000

Thomas Watteyne writes:
> We need to discuss this point urgently, and do the work to ask the
> IEEE for carve out some IE space for IETF/6TISCH if applicable.

There is Vendor specific IE space for both header and payload IEs.
Those can be used provided IETF has OUI allocated from RAC. The
802.15.9 uses ethertypes, so you can allocate one of ethertypes for
generic, or you can ask for an number from 802.15.9 specific range.

I think for this the 802.15.9 would be better, as it would also
provide the fragmentation and multiplexing layer, meaning you are not
restricted to 127 byte limit.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email