Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt

Jiliang Wang <jiliangwang99@gmail.com> Tue, 26 July 2016 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jiliangwang99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC0912D66E for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 01:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id soXfr89Om0iH for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 01:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B36A12D674 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 01:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id z8so168351770ywa.1 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 01:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YACRvMrE4J/m8pKqhd88xO0C0Nm2URZOrkCc6vF6Ggg=; b=R5kGvbnzZh90BP679FFimDei2pqpSYsLdlQnXR9RV28ZzoUpCMOsXJj4fLBhF8a9f3 FckF88LhzUMc/LmdmvVsHrdjzdEPWOq4P24KZWQjv/M6/ELVtVqgxpg6TL/G0I1cx7HM iQdMbeFZmMhiK8XTejsKp+z8HzKeUR/e8HET0P9y1NCo/kKEqa5fmCdLOZbvUaEPpy6Z FVw4j/uXkq3BjaAWVCYHKGF9C4GTLNk1pYYMTMfZQDSzoVt+gWpkosHKzNgbdSNohxm7 KluTE1lR4PJFGcY5GfP+IwGdBDsYAoJcoPjq+Nz4HnvzU+cHBC0f/PhZw4DwsFxbPFNW mKAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YACRvMrE4J/m8pKqhd88xO0C0Nm2URZOrkCc6vF6Ggg=; b=h8wfjatFCx+ZmLDF/XvvPnbTx8TON8Y6mZAA9LRqE7jmXThcQ478/+q8IfqGh/BSl4 BmLhwohdINnRJQ8AqroefPdAHEj1zWVxsu6rMMmiRIodZZZISVA6ooFoXqNdXd2XHWgF NUVHvLChNFxiX9yNq20QVpotgM/23Gw9YNx5oIqEu5RFAiZoXRn1svNABH/M4iQwAxum usGNWyBK5TKmR8839cs2SyyKSs4sRu0IuaXzFprtPCI4XOwEgBjip2PwV+HZlAByZos+ kQcVlXo/V3kMXvkMH5nzlRUeSaYZYdP6kcsHRyh+tPhqSZs7/pdusvZe4W2sQcL1oZfC PmAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouusehwin/wVa9brveyfjnDvFGl2dEooyPjqMRUbaWhhVkiZCPAHgtDN2Qpn5k24/g9vQs49hoC5N3CmQA==
X-Received: by 10.176.6.9 with SMTP id f9mr8658612uaf.89.1469520302634; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.142.74 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMsDxWRQ1+zbhuCypNS2aHsTtXCtu+MnMu6ig89vLrk2_FxaEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160726063035.11416.82424.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMsDxWRQ1+zbhuCypNS2aHsTtXCtu+MnMu6ig89vLrk2_FxaEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jiliang Wang <jiliangwang99@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:05:02 +0800
Message-ID: <CAC=zv2PJgn1AJO+qGh+B1xMXf9AXBtkqbOV5=EH=b7GTpYThGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xavier Vilajosana <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c123562a0fb880538855bb5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/Agw5aFy-hh4UqGw_j_WxMNrrY44>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:05:05 -0000

Thanks for the great work. This is Jiliang Wang from Tsinghua University. I
am very interested in this version and I just have several questions.

1.       In 4.3.10, it says “If node A requests more cells than can fit in
the response, node B MUST return code RC_ERR_NORES and an empty cell list.”

1.- Is there any fragmentation method to transmit all the cells if the
requested cells cannot be fit in a response?

2.       Will the clear command result in inconsistency in current design?
For example, a clear command is sent from A to B and the response from B to
A is lost.

3.       Currently, the add command supports best-effort cell adding, i.e.,
when the cells is not enough, partial of the cells can be added – if I
understand correctly.

 –what is the purpose of best-effort adding. Why not just return success
and fail?
best,

-------------
Jiliang Wang
Assistant Professor
http://tns.thss.tsinghua.edu.cn/~jiliang/

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Xavier Vilajosana <
xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> we have submitted a revision of the 6top draft. It includes most of the
> changes proposed in the WG meeting in Berlin.
>
> please send us your comments.
>
> kind regards,
> Xavi
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Date: 2016-07-26 8:30 GMT+02:00
> Subject: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
>
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e
> of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : 6top Protocol (6P)
>         Authors         : Qin Wang
>                           Xavier Vilajosana
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt
>         Pages           : 28
>         Date            : 2016-07-25
>
> Abstract:
>    This document defines the 6top Protocol (6P), which enables
>    distributed scheduling in 6TiSCH networks.  6P allows neighbor nodes
>    in a 6TiSCH network to add/delete TSCH cells to one another.  6P is
>    part of the 6TiSCH Operation Sublayer (6top), the next higher layer
>    of the IEEE802.15.4 TSCH medium access control layer.  The 6top
>    Scheduling Function (SF) decides when to add/delete cells, and
>    triggers 6P Transactions.  Several SFs can be defined, each
>    identified by a different 6top Scheduling Function Identifier (SFID).
>    This document lists the requirements for an SF, but leaves the
>    definition of the SF out of scope.  Different SFs are expected to be
>    defined in future companion specifications.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>