Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt
"Lijo Thomas" <lijo@cdac.in> Fri, 29 July 2016 13:05 UTC
Return-Path: <lijo@cdac.in>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F2C12D82D for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wu8MoZyGhoq4 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailsender.cdac.in (mailsender.cdac.in [196.1.113.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBA2112D875 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ims.pune.cdac.in (ims.pune.cdac.in [10.208.1.15]) by mailsender.cdac.in (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u6TD4piS026596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:34:51 +0530
Received: from mailgw.pune.cdac.in ([10.208.1.4]) by ims.pune.cdac.in (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u6TD42N7024454; Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:34:02 +0530
X-AuthUser: lijo
Received: from CIGLIJO (cig_lijo.tvm.cdac.in [10.176.11.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailgw.pune.cdac.in (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6TD41pS029094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:34:01 +0530
From: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>
To: 'Xavier Vilajosana' <xvilajosana@eecs.berkeley.edu>, 6tisch@ietf.org
References: <20160726063035.11416.82424.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMsDxWRQ1+zbhuCypNS2aHsTtXCtu+MnMu6ig89vLrk2_FxaEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMsDxWRQ1+zbhuCypNS2aHsTtXCtu+MnMu6ig89vLrk2_FxaEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:38:36 +0530
Message-ID: <007c01d1e99a$51ca41a0$f55ec4e0$@cdac.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007D_01D1E9C8.6B89A990"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQG7zCE5aP51E38ec2v3CafRESO7DQHsF4LIoEw3ckA=
Content-Language: en-in
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-ID: u6TD42N7024454
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-MCPCheck-IMS: MCP-Clean, MCP-Checker (score=0, required 1)
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.286, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_40 -0.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD -1.29, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00), not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.539, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_20 -0.74, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00)
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-Information: Please contact npsfhelp@cdac.in/mailadmin@cdac.in for more information
X-MailScanner-ID: u6TD4piS026596
X-CDAC-PUNE-MailScanner-From: lijo@cdac.in
X-CDAC-MailScanner-Spam-Status: No
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/nNhrznpoaluxVEyfeHvEKF_Z5-o>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:05:22 -0000
Hi Xavi, I observed a small typo in section 4.2.10 instead of node it is written as note I am bit confused with Consitency description in 4.1 You mean to say that the nodes should keep the count for each ADD/DELETE with the neighbor, does it create problem when a node has multiple neighbors Is this used for cross checking the schedules after the cell allocation/deletion process. Thanks & Regards, Lijo Thomas From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xavier Vilajosana Sent: 26 July 2016 12:02 To: 6tisch@ietf.org Subject: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt Dear all, we have submitted a revision of the 6top draft. It includes most of the changes proposed in the WG meeting in Berlin. please send us your comments. kind regards, Xavi ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: < <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: 2016-07-26 8:30 GMT+02:00 Subject: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt To: <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> 6tisch@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e of the IETF. Title : 6top Protocol (6P) Authors : Qin Wang Xavier Vilajosana Filename : draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02.txt Pages : 28 Date : 2016-07-25 Abstract: This document defines the 6top Protocol (6P), which enables distributed scheduling in 6TiSCH networks. 6P allows neighbor nodes in a 6TiSCH network to add/delete TSCH cells to one another. 6P is part of the 6TiSCH Operation Sublayer (6top), the next higher layer of the IEEE802.15.4 TSCH medium access control layer. The 6top Scheduling Function (SF) decides when to add/delete cells, and triggers 6P Transactions. Several SFs can be defined, each identified by a different 6top Scheduling Function Identifier (SFID). This document lists the requirements for an SF, but leaves the definition of the SF out of scope. Different SFs are expected to be defined in future companion specifications. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol/ There's also a htmlized version available at: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at <http://tools.ietf.org> tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org> 6tisch@ietf.org <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ] This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Xavi Vilajosana Guillén
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Xavier Vilajosana
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Xavier Vilajosana
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Jiliang Wang
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Jiliang Wang
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Xavier Vilajosana
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Xavier Vilajosana
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Jiliang Wang
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Lijo Thomas
- Re: [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6… Jiliang Wang
- [6tisch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-… Xavier Vilajosana
- [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-proto… internet-drafts