[6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: Token to identify transactions in 6P

"Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> Thu, 03 March 2016 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CCF1A016A for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:30:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.122
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.122 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_BOTCC=2.5] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vx4_E65hQ81P for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:30:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B8F1A0108 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l68so136487357wml.0 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:30:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail-udp-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ljZEZlFpjlugw1Z905MjVg8aUp3gMFPxVfG7aMfNjCw=; b=kIvG24C6YR4w50A3upCtxnjwz+mJ+KBnOjAud8BBIqbdqkcOpGVlWSfZ0k3saOD1HN 9xs54V36RpjUorL7/MLGbP4+DWu4SkHqKUynM7LM4fpdgp0+5a8eONmA2UczNP7ddR4j aGJBE+m7wjy0d+0HDHLC03XxOny6auliM/gPhp790/A5PoKq0Xp6Ojnn2w+QjXTwYS1R F/cH7dyT3B01L064PFlW75Cr91YzLk7oU3QChMa+kdxoUT4bbghGdbai8SEorUpBgTad c5YNlnxV0Ea+/J0kSPilx0ZV0aSTRpfv8E+FpriZ/x6jnS17+qxtoVjAXRIy8C1nuOS+ 5wPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ljZEZlFpjlugw1Z905MjVg8aUp3gMFPxVfG7aMfNjCw=; b=VUWqGyKgsf+NMSfa8dBV9NVxaRHZgH6x5oCh4ysETGQQIEf8idTI3+IdPWPjIo4jcz Q4CX2L3TduM0GdXuaaCTHkFH3QK8eWOPQ+FPtjcU+2gW9Ew6lUwiYNyagzpfke9KVsgj xlg7fKzL5SIORQom/uI7JfGK8qFpCz5X4UPp3i3WIOnQ+VdZtS/mVhb0uQW/gv04drXG 0lxDHgDIhGMVnuc3bdUrasb9JOz7a257kBU1FtGnDM2WmMCK/AJNmfK2sML4N6nJtOI9 /NJpNltg2byfu6y/cGuN8kRpoD2N34AfNXI2c0CzWRfwWRxlZDARwf1LOGwwTrXHMoNM zo7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ1chiw8Fxr3d3VDaWRuequXFdGK0A6NlW2nyBOfroV34w6/HC3WZQHOkWB1ZedavdsgciNPjimUR/6zg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.186.11 with SMTP id k11mr3955460wmf.79.1457019038508; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.11.195 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:30:38 -0300
Message-ID: <CAH7SZV-2kwi7UwVCKJJL6P3sb4j-osFG5OtEj22h_RRdPKHsZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114b0b3038f640052d26ae5e
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/HcEEvykXuf9k_R1_H6CBuyuxv2I>
Subject: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: Token to identify transactions in 6P
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:30:43 -0000

Dear all,
            In order to continue the discussion we left
unfinished at the Interim meeting in March 26th, I
will open a number of threads to take action on several
pending issues for the drafts:

draft-wang-6tisch-6top-sublayer-04 (which will be renamed to 6top-protocol)
draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-sf0-00

- Regarding the use of a Token to identify transactions on
the 6top protocol, there was a proposal on the call to add
an 8-bit field to the packet header.

Do you agree with this solution?

Regards,

                              Diego Dujovne

-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125