IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP?

Qin Wang <qinwang6top@yahoo.com> Fri, 09 October 2015 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <qinwang6top@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F201A9103 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CeIfmSYHsNcb for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm41.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm41.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B411A90EB for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1444420279; bh=scDloqPrrGIty/8gRb+8SCPfeIYfAaJxmck6DymyE5I=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=OTSOZxzsid53651QckQPVmWNGv8M08VwCoGpt1lGTRn5KEPoFnNCtC1uYihcy1iq7/h6HrSnwVpMIrUI8O5QGxKqUbfFYUQbb1el3QzEtkUhmWZW67M5Mu/urZ/s21KxVINfkVDB40MXlPxboryijJl80OH4H5/MkIIiI0Bh0WjsARCvrmWZSyE4lPyJbuCWLR/1wO/SEKjIFfZjhiBBjheKAQFPLa+4Hs36KuC1/2gBS4rogngI8itUMpNSET+yAJgWpGXr8YUGDHz/R0osMyBCJ3bs1Ey03JlINpX0KPTRXAyFsois7x8lrwUlxJFR+NyWmwGdkxirsaN6BuiBxg==
Received: from [98.139.170.181] by nm41.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Oct 2015 19:51:19 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.193] by tm24.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Oct 2015 19:51:19 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Oct 2015 19:51:19 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 754301.95958.bm@omp1002.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: xdlxwsEVM1k2kBvfOXhb0VfPt_j4JDtZNwgh1E3IpOInA4iXKnyqxE61lKJjdZl 9sI7eWUutObiU4Kvr3cXP53brcdO3cTNuUpepJCOyWunpsjhUNjP5FrNw0sLHgEtxjDkp1Iivwa3 dxWrYOA3X0hRRVO2ci4K.CGYtskEOcNYSikaBcFzQ5lqEwMLPwHSDry9FeE5OI9POW7_RECnMa6L K_g8cr27vo9u6soy7tAC5ZJhPV9zha5yEA3GVlrQGqXOvu8HKbGNgZjgeIulGrRZ8E9A4hxFx_KC hxjZEDh3FWZsZDoJVFgDYkJUeXSYrn3NYJ4CN3J84oHq4zk_l19bszEAkEoCQ3BT6K7JFdJFeqfq FngnT_9cpXFgfQK8FCh2afQ6sQB4nSMSyMfkwjvJc1H18E0hWeMFejxFzdgEppTl3AdoOWgkIk9U 3KQQ5noQzT8JghUTlMdPk.w0sK95WR2PB4CDJhAwxMu9o3iua7rg2GrusiMYm8WZYFC7y0.pe6ZS 3kQ--
Received: by 76.13.27.132; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 19:51:19 +0000
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 19:51:04 +0000
From: Qin Wang <qinwang6top@yahoo.com>
To: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <2023104309.1515406.1444420264063.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH7SZV9oAf_2rgCCB4XpQEtbW5JEGvnPw6Dih9EVdOZ9nwQjBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH7SZV9oAf_2rgCCB4XpQEtbW5JEGvnPw6Dih9EVdOZ9nwQjBw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1515405_180474872.1444420264040"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/dNuVpgUv05892AmICNnIGgB_-8k>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, Pat Kinney <pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP?
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Qin Wang <qinwang6top@yahoo.com>
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 19:51:23 -0000

Hi Pascal and all,
I don't understand the meaning of  "with the capability for IoT routers to appropriatechunks of the matrix without starving, or interfering with, other 6TiSCH nodes." (even IoT routers is replaced with "6tisch router"). I cannot figure out what the capability is. Can you explain it more?
ThanksQin



 


     On Friday, October 9, 2015 3:33 PM, Prof. Diego Dujovne <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> wrote:
   

 Pascal, Pat:
                  Sounds good to me "6tisch routers".
Regards,

                          Diego
           

2015-10-09 12:59 GMT-03:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>:

Good point Pat. I found it strange as well as I was rereading this.Should I say 6TiSCH routers?   Cheers, Pascal From: Pat Kinney [mailto:pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com]
Sent: vendredi 9 octobre 2015 17:53
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Pascal; I agree with your change, but I wonder why we need to consider only IoT routers?  Shouldn’t we removed the IoT constraint? Pat Pat KinneyKinney Consulting LLCIEEE 802.15 WG vice chair, SC chairISA100 co-chair, ISA100.20 chairO: +1.847.960.3715pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com On 9, Oct2015, at 10:48, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: Dear all: Following up on the comments at the interim, My suggestion is to update item 3 as follows:  3. Produce an “On-the-fly" (OTF) specification to enable a distributed dynamicscheduling of time slots with the capability for IoT routers to appropriatechunks of the matrix without starving, or interfering with, other 6TiSCH nodes.This particular work will focus on IP traffic since the work on tracks is notyet advanced enough to specify their requirements for OTF operations. I remove the ‘for IP traffic’ within the main text to indicate that the initial focus isN IP traffic but I hope that now it is more clear that future work on tracks is not precluded.Does that address the comment? Cheers, Pascal _______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch 
_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch





-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email