[6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP?
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 09 October 2015 15:48 UTC
Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679F91B44BD for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vosjqqNGvauZ for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47E71B44BC for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4352; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444405732; x=1445615332; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Byat/mwM7u/VARMn4xcyBHLDr0MFowTi6s6uWUyXRbU=; b=VaVCzB+8geFYq2Hvp9C6iNk55PvXsnlAw2wKfh3Slrd9C+9/ZdoykhZj ZRQ40RMT3ywWelDqo01V7/yoyqGZOpZOBh3BfdLXfvpOdLMnN9rX3elHR WCr/dlDd4TcyN3hiRzrOLoUJNyKM2/cvGie67QRoV/otSIThK4VoVNfYc I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A7BgBO4RdW/4gNJK1egllNVHS9boFagxOCCoJGOhIBAQEBAQEBfwuELS1eAQx0JgEEG4gmn2mkCQEBAQEGAQEBAQEBARuCUYQijkAFlhIBjRKBX4x/hGCIRwEoBDeEAodVgQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.17,658,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="39904470"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Oct 2015 15:48:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t99FmpmH008467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:48:51 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:48:48 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:48:48 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OTF: IP or not IP?
Thread-Index: AdECqW8fPVUUcck7Q36O2xtUZk9N9A==
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:48:45 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:48:03 +0000
Message-ID: <197177af4dd145889c61c7e283f708ee@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_197177af4dd145889c61c7e283f708eeXCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/h4maDPP0jgTl1oJj1KB8DohyEVg>
Subject: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP?
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:48:54 -0000
Dear all: Following up on the comments at the interim, My suggestion is to update item 3 as follows: 3. Produce an "On-the-fly" (OTF) specification to enable a distributed dynamic scheduling of time slots with the capability for IoT routers to appropriate chunks of the matrix without starving, or interfering with, other 6TiSCH nodes. This particular work will focus on IP traffic since the work on tracks is not yet advanced enough to specify their requirements for OTF operations. I remove the 'for IP traffic' within the main text to indicate that the initial focus is N IP traffic but I hope that now it is more clear that future work on tracks is not precluded. Does that address the comment? Cheers, Pascal
- [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Pat Kinney
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Qin Wang
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Wang, Chonggang
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP? Wang, Chonggang