Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetingsin real meeting rooms)
"YAO Jiankang" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Wed, 31 March 2010 02:44 UTC
Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7A33A68EE for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <FToKhfdfdYaF>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.211
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.524, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FToKhfdfdYaF for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 265133A6782 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (eyou send program); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:44:39 +0800
Message-ID: <470003479.26659@cnnic.cn>
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown (HELO lenovo47e041cf) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:44:39 +0800
Message-ID: <07079FEAC59D4AD8B9B8530B0A1C2760@LENOVO47E041CF>
From: YAO Jiankang <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU>, 77attendees@ietf.org
References: <114B7D3F-7906-41BE-ABB6-F3BFAB110671@softarmor.com><4BB1F00B.7070504@gmail.com><4BB2051E.6070204@fandm.edu><4BB20C6E.4080908@ericsson.com><4623EEB5D02D4A67BA4CB5ED54F10790@china.huawei.com><47C61786-20E0-4501-B31A-228FAB76598A@arsc.edu> <469974559.31988@cnnic.cn>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:44:58 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetingsin real meeting rooms)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:44:11 -0000
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Hardjono" <hardjono@MIT.EDU> To: <77attendees@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:42 AM Subject: Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetingsin real meeting rooms) > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: 77attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:77attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On >> Behalf Of Melinda Shore >> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:22 PM >> To: Spencer Dawkins >> Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetings in >> real meeting rooms) >> >> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: >> > I'm remembering various companies doing this as far back as the late >> > 1990s (and I wasn't around before that, but wouldn't be surprised if >> > the practice started earlier). Is there a reason the IETF should >> > have a policy about such things? ("what problem are we solving?") >> >> I've been with several companies that have done that and in those >> cases the companies booked and paid for the rooms independently >> of the IETF. I'd be hard-pressed to come up with a reason for >> why the IETF should have any policy about those cases. >> >> Melinda > > If the IETF is selling green dots, why not sublease rooms to companies. Perhaps even make some $$ out of it :) that will transform ietf into a profit organization. > > May be it should've sold T-shirts too... > > /thomas/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 77attendees mailing list > 77attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees
- [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings in real meeting roo… Dean Willis
- Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings in real meeting… Fred Baker
- Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings in real meeting… Richard Barnes
- Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings in real meeting… Brian E Carpenter
- [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc… Janardhan Iyengar
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… joel.jaeggli
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Melinda Shore
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Eliot Lear
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [77attendees] Ad hoc meetings in real meeting… Scott Brim
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Scott Brim
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Jari Arkko
- Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad… Melinda Shore