Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetings in real meeting rooms)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB773A6847 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23-KBl1eHTD1 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7613A6823 for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj4CACPisUuQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACDEpgcFQEBCwsiBhynSog+kGACgSmCa2oE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,335,1267401600"; d="scan'208";a="58759355"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2010 18:41:22 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-55-82-147.cisco.com (dhcp-10-55-82-147.cisco.com [10.55.82.147]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2UIfLw0007556; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:41:21 GMT
Message-ID: <4BB245D1.8010104@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:41:21 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.2pre) Gecko/20100302 Lanikai/3.1b1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
References: <114B7D3F-7906-41BE-ABB6-F3BFAB110671@softarmor.com> <4BB1F00B.7070504@gmail.com><4BB2051E.6070204@fandm.edu> <4BB20C6E.4080908@ericsson.com> <4623EEB5D02D4A67BA4CB5ED54F10790@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4623EEB5D02D4A67BA4CB5ED54F10790@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc meetings in real meeting rooms)
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:40:55 -0000

  I think there is some confusion.  Brian is suggesting that the IETF 
not finance company meetings.  If your company paid for the meeting 
(regardless of whether you saw the bill), as far as I'm concerned, what 
business is it of the IETF?  I wouldn't even mind the IETF letting out 
unused rooms to companies but for the fact that we'd surely run low, and 
there would be no easy way to fairly allocate them.

Eliot


On 3/30/10 5:44 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> I didn't see a bill for it, but I wasn't the requester, either - 
> anyway, my understanding is that Huawei paid for a meeting room on 
> Sunday night as well.
>
> I'm remembering various companies doing this as far back as the late 
> 1990s (and I wasn't around before that, but wouldn't be surprised if 
> the practice started earlier). Is there a reason the IETF should have 
> a policy about such things? ("what problem are we solving?")
>
> Thanks,
>
> Spencer
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Magnus Westerlund" 
> <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
> To: <jiyengar@fandm.edu>
> Cc: <77attendees@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [77attendees] Single Company Meetings (Re: Ad hoc 
> meetings in real meeting rooms)
>
>
> Janardhan Iyengar skrev 2010-03-30 16:05:
>> Brian,
>>
>>> for a nod from an AD though; the IETF shouldn't be lending rooms for
>>> purposes such as single-company meetings, and you can't expect the
>>
>> So, what is the IETF policy on single-company meetings?  I saw at 
>> least one happen at IETF77.
>
> At this IETF I know that Ericsson and at least one more company paid for
> a meeting room on Sunday.
>
> cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> 77attendees mailing list
> 77attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees
> _______________________________________________
> 77attendees mailing list
> 77attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees
>