Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on content providers
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 15 March 2010 01:39 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 77attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754FC3A68F8 for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.564
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.564 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LvCOVluQVdCN for <77attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBC83A67FF for <77attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (not verified)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32274E606C; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2F1dOj9002744; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:39:24 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <201003150139.o2F1dOj9002744@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <4B9D70B7.2050001@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:26:47 +1300." <4B9D70B7.2050001@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:39:24 +1100
Sender: marka@isc.org
Cc: 77attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on content providers
X-BeenThere: 77attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <77attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/77attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:77attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees>, <mailto:77attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:39:25 -0000
In message <4B9D70B7.2050001@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter writes: > Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on content providers > > Day: Tuesday March 23 > Time: 17:30 > Room: TBD > > Inspired by some remarks of Lorenzo Colitti (Google) at the recent > APRICOT/APNIC meeting in Kuala Lumpur, we plan to discuss the value > of a short draft aimed *specifically* at content providers, to describe > the impact on them and their customers if many of those customers are > trapped behind double IPv4 NAT (NAT444). Clearly the issues are not > news, but they tend to be described in complex general drafts, or > mixed in with proposed solutions or alternatives to double NAT. > > Quoting Lorenzo: "...it would be > good to put together an IETF draft that very concisely lists the problems of > NAT444 from the content provider perspective. For example: worse geolocation > for targeted advertising and streaming content restrictions; higher latency; > IP blocking for abuse/spam causing collateral damage, etc." These don't appear to be limited to NAT444, DS-Lite and NAT64 also have these issues as they are trying to put more users behind less addresses. > (Also see http://www.isoc.org/educpillar/resources/docs/ipv6_200905.pdf) > > The bar BOF agenda is to decide whether to proceed with such a draft and > if so, to identify the people who will write it and the target date. > > Highly relevant existing documents include: > > draft-ford-shared-addressing-issues-02.txt > draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues-03.txt > > Drafts that touch on the topic in one way or another include: > > draft-nishitani-cgn-04.txt > draft-shirasaki-nat444-01.txt > draft-shirasaki-nat444-isp-shared-addr-03.txt > draft-shirasaki-isp-shared-addr-04.txt > draft-davies-reusable-ipv4-address-block-00.txt > draft-boucadair-port-range-02.txt > draft-ymbk-aplusp-05.txt > draft-thaler-port-restricted-ip-issues-00.txt > > Brian Carpenter > (whose only commitment is to make the bar BOF happen) > _______________________________________________ > 77attendees mailing list > 77attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/77attendees -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on conten… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Mark Andrews
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Simon Perreault
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Dan Wing
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Chris Morrow
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Chris Morrow
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Matthew Ford
- Re: [77attendees] Bar BOF: Impact of NAT444 on co… Brian E Carpenter