Re: [88attendees] elevator security theater

Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@tricolour.ca> Sat, 16 November 2013 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rgb@tricolour.ca>
X-Original-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B560A11E8176 for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:21:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgRIfzz5hGgO for <88attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rhayader.tricolour.net (rhayader.tricolour.ca [IPv6:2001:470:b13d:1::4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD7A11E8115 for <88attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:20:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rhayader.tricolour.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAA2E2042; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:20:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:20:49 -0500
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@tricolour.ca>
To: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
Message-ID: <20131116132049.GW17796@rhayader.tricolour.net>
References: <ho26bf7o.8t9ohlwxci3u@login5-be.medallia.com> <9CC8BA35-DAAF-4090-AD9E-69117B775B53@fugue.com> <20131116100946.GD25947@x28.adm.denic.de> <95B5FEA1-E170-4829-BFB2-F760E4BDA3B5@fugue.com> <20131116131807.GE25947@x28.adm.denic.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131116131807.GE25947@x28.adm.denic.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: 88attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [88attendees] elevator security theater
X-BeenThere: 88attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 88 attendees that have opted in to the list." <88attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/88attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:88attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/88attendees>, <mailto:88attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:21:00 -0000

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:18:07PM +0100, Peter Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 08:01:00AM -0500, Ted Lemon wrote:
> 
> > It wouldn't be the first hotel we've stayed at where you have to use your room key to get on the elevator.   But yeah.
> 
> that might actually be useful, at least for the good feeling.
> Allowing the target floor only, or making it the default,
> both reduce the search space for somebody who "finds" the key card.

...and prevents legitimate folks from meeting up with colleagues or
friends on a different floor.

> -Peter

	slainte mhath, RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs               --  ~\    -- ~\            <hpv.tricolour.net>
<www.TriColour.net>                --  \___   o \@       @       Ride yer bike!
Ottawa, ON, CANADA                  --  Lo_>__M__\\/\%__\\/\%
Vote! -- <greenparty.ca>_____GTVS6#790__(*)__(*)________(*)(*)_________________