IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 04 May 2020 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634C33A0CB2 for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gp-EPJI1iYdC for <ace@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91DF3A0C37 for <ace@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 May 2020 23:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from client-0127.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0127.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.127]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49FtnQ442Xzyyg; Mon, 4 May 2020 08:51:54 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <6cab8f7fcdbf441fbc3ca747cfb09a72@combitech.se>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 08:51:54 +0200
Cc: peter van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, Ace <ace@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 610267914.0958951-13b31278f0bb7d30f20143c3b58a81d1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A2EA0484-662E-4FE9-B35C-F78DFD3287C1@tzi.org>
References: <56d31e581571721e176b59db20e08c23@bbhmail.nl> <00f101d61f03$a26bb920$e7432b60$@augustcellars.com> <0873a3115cab89036002cf42b1c97608@bbhmail.nl> <6cab8f7fcdbf441fbc3ca747cfb09a72@combitech.se>
To: Seitz Ludwig <ludwig.seitz@combitech.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/LA-O8f7ks20RJvVJXZcAkh1nLx4>
Subject: Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 06:52:01 -0000

On 2020-05-04, at 08:42, Seitz Ludwig <ludwig.seitz@combitech.se> wrote:
> 
> For the sake of getting the document finished before I die of old age ;-) would it be possible to specify this in a separate document?

I think there may be multiple of these RT registrations, because the fact that a resource is part of an AS is only part of the information that is needed: The RT could tell us more about the way the AS wants to be used.

I think that is a strong argument to *not* do these RT registrations in the framework, because we will not have enough imagination to catch them all.

So my recommendation would indeed be a separate document.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email