IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ace] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-14

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 09 March 2022 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ace@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781243A123F; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:39:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.186, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7IGwqEAjdgfC; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:39:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420F73A1288; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 229NdjV7009857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 18:39:50 -0500
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:39:44 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Cc: Cigdem Sengul <cigdem.sengul@gmail.com>, Jean Mahoney <mahoney@nostrum.com>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, Ace Wg <ace@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20220309233944.GS22457@mit.edu>
References: <164643005466.28393.1552756094187219874@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA7SwCOUHYJTpt-0JOVfwxZ1jgpDve87k2sSpxho=iS6q7Mgfg@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB42177EE2866E544D286A4AE9980A9@HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB42177EE2866E544D286A4AE9980A9@HE1PR07MB4217.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/gKQ3xcvhZIVjDewWnqwKn5g-xPw>
Subject: Re: [Ace] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-ace-mqtt-tls-profile-14
X-BeenThere: ace@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments \(ace\)" <ace.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ace/>
List-Post: <mailto:ace@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace>, <mailto:ace-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 23:40:00 -0000

On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:27:40PM +0000, Francesca Palombini wrote:
> 
> Just one note: for the downref to informative documents (for those documents that were actually included in the text), please revert the change – RFC 6234 and RFC 8032 were correctly referenced as normative, since they are mandatory to implement. MQTT standards are also correctly referenced normatively. Jean was only noting these appear as downrefs, but downrefs are not “mistakes”, they just require more attention – see https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp97 for more information. Downrefs are usually Last Called to make sure the community is aware of them, except for those that have appeared as downref for many documents and don’t need to be Last Called explicitly anymore: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref/.

Exactly so.  Thanks for the quick clarification, Francesca!

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email