[Ace] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. My review did not notice any
transport related issues.

However, I have one observation-

  It seems the word "server" has been used in three ways - 1) CMP server, 2)
  server and 3) pre-configured/configured server. I would be great if 2) and 3)
  could be described better based on their role. Right now, this is a bit
  confusing, for example, when only 2) used and it refers to a CMP server.