[Acme] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-caa-07: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 29 May 2019 17:59 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: acme@ietf.org
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D756512006E; Wed, 29 May 2019 10:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-acme-caa@ietf.org, Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org>, acme-chairs@ietf.org, cpu@letsencrypt.org, acme@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.97.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <155915276787.5510.9421925777415588250.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 10:59:27 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/8zik8EQ4_ucLyqbA_T0ptVwfsXs>
Subject: [Acme] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-caa-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 17:59:28 -0000
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-caa-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-caa/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to everyone who worked on this extension. I support Barry's first DISCUSS point. Beyond that concern, I have only one comment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §5.4: > Suppose that both CA A and CA B issue account URIs of the form > > "account-id:1234" This is a little concerning as an example, as "account-id" isn't a registered URI scheme. Consider instead using: urn:example:account-id:1234
- [Acme] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-ac… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [Acme] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Hugo Landau