Re: [Acme] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-caa-07: (with COMMENT)

Hugo Landau <hlandau@devever.net> Thu, 30 May 2019 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <hlandau@devever.net>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132F8120136; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=devever.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aAuBU9wRBw1L; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umbriel.devever.net (umbriel.devever.net [149.202.51.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5DD1120077; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbriel.devever.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235251C055; Thu, 30 May 2019 19:44:23 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=devever.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:content-type:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :received:received; s=mimas; t=1559238263; x=1577427624; bh=kgBi lYbmo5p3c2Q1YDoi8j8vvILx7jGgys+FP1OynBA=; b=AXFh/UeEfeYZqtQEmjZj 7T1aSIFxmzbSogaI7GrtmZjJAUl+/C/WOpCSox+tgkGUVYAfVq93zTUgRGVUdmZi n7tWTLcmObl8qvqZGon5SJ106TfbA3sINNtE4d57qCJjSDipC/O9uo2JapG/UoXf OU5tbygEfkJLngFqiH/Fa2D8/06oLS/0fM+lkBZO0F0Oy0bd0mHidGlj1441qMQy OX8zlUwHAslv7ugVlKHQOHNyBBc1P4W1H5Blafahgsc3ccrHlvWgVoZAFJ4b/MjK xtXTnXQWcAdKZ/c1uinU4cVgXUDyk95oI0YJqiARLHDqiVSJfhggwbRh14FcGOGU Cg==
Received: from umbriel.devever.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (umbriel.devever.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id md2RWfQ5oOQr; Thu, 30 May 2019 19:44:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from axminster (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by umbriel.devever.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFEC1C04E; Thu, 30 May 2019 19:44:22 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 18:44:22 +0100
From: Hugo Landau <hlandau@devever.net>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-acme-caa@ietf.org, Daniel McCarney <cpu@letsencrypt.org>, acme-chairs@ietf.org, acme@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190530174422.GB12694@axminster>
References: <155915276787.5510.9421925777415588250.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <155915276787.5510.9421925777415588250.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/sdnvQ8r-O8xJRGdG5pS84A3GFyg>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-caa-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:44:26 -0000

> §5.4:
> 
> >  Suppose that both CA A and CA B issue account URIs of the form
> >
> >  "account-id:1234"
> 
> This is a little concerning as an example, as "account-id" isn't a registered
> URI scheme. Consider instead using:
> 
>   urn:example:account-id:1234
> 
Done.