Re: [Acme] Draft agenda timing

"Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <haibin.song@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA271A03E1 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 20:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8IAwW8o8U7AE for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 20:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90B81A00E4 for <acme@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 20:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BTK46070; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 03:08:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.40) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 03:08:57 +0000
Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.146]) by nkgeml409-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 11:08:54 +0800
From: "Songhaibin (A)" <haibin.song@huawei.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Draft agenda timing
Thread-Index: AQHQWFVEX/vyd93aYkKArIL+RGPDGZ0Tefnw
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 03:08:53 +0000
Message-ID: <E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F65246E87@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+9kkMBzrr6=7TtTrOHTCXQA6WKdCHvTEiLFjx252pv2xuASNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBzrr6=7TtTrOHTCXQA6WKdCHvTEiLFjx252pv2xuASNg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.49]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E33E01DFD5BEA24B9F3F18671078951F65246E87nkgeml501mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/YcOVw3dVRzq-kDevVXwoLf-egSI>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Draft agenda timing
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 03:09:02 -0000

Both ETSI NFV community and ONF SDN community are working on certificate management, and they also want automated certificate management to the VNF or logical/physical switches. I think although in draft-barnes-acme DV (domain validation) is the initial use case for ACME to address, NFV/SDN certificate management could be the next step. They need a different way to challenge the certificate requester.

Best Regards!
-Haibin

From: Acme [mailto:acme-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Hardie
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 5:34 AM
To: acme@ietf.org; Salz, Rich
Subject: [Acme] Draft agenda timing

Rich and I are thinking of this as the breakdown of how we'd spend the hour we have; comments welcome.
ACME BOF
IETF 92
Time: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 1520-1620​
​Location: Venetian Room​

​Administrivia: 5​
Motivating requirements: 10
​Possible additional requirements from industry​: 10
Review of draft-barnes-acme: 15
Discussion: 20
regards,
Ted and Rich