Re: [Acme] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6104)

Seo Suchan <tjtncks@gmail.com> Wed, 03 January 2024 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tjtncks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403CFC2FEE0B for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:15:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nezTJUjtNXSS for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B28C00A6B7 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:15:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-59496704246so4034580eaf.2 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 06:15:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704291333; x=1704896133; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:references :in-reply-to:user-agent:subject:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LH09iNytRQkCsEKMJuyUrREcm0LsAi9Kdb6gbJNqvxs=; b=RaJ+AdfK8LyTw4/A5svdsN4S5cCqX504MrcNA7puEoGqvoCEiJF/vMNpP9b3hxt6/t mGhS6wNmpnddTJ62Y/W1YLBfzk0/avzbCf1IqC1ExAg/cE10MnSUc280pKpuAYPvyotV tM6I/u6PmrTbQyWds9LwykWLWAUQRmWz6lQ9fVIjphKtrVvBWZ7gbHHXwe2iYV7dFhby AW7REAzjgs7a1/MU8tbiXQIfinG9crJPzS1wMHBIpr6LvzD3XzzBfvxjSDebajla4t00 dTLVAZqFNuWE1T/mx1lGuhMVoi1/j/r0OXIJv7gXBvaYIdj/RpMyqHxYb7+hpZpqQf7/ a6uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704291333; x=1704896133; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:references :in-reply-to:user-agent:subject:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LH09iNytRQkCsEKMJuyUrREcm0LsAi9Kdb6gbJNqvxs=; b=cngdNxqG2B9LIV2+F7X3FhjsDjMqpRoiScfH8RhYaRb3u3e1yT0ws7ehA348B32yIq JRbZSadT/fqfDI/QD74d8b6jI4eGCnR8hE4MTyIxsIhRkZMYKD/GqZumK/vxk/E1HVmF qjIK2/d8EcGH4M+cR7boNw2CjASdFPdIanNBGGzoKk1JtS2yY+WSjjun4pj+vMSWkdZg oud+HHiO1+M919lsw2J0PUm6X7Z7KorcFNrb0oLNjpkllg6p40YbvdcAv5LqHVgHxRUP ADA5Nc+lOHTKn2Hv02FNLydGp5qVY/bi9xdlDJLnyAgurac4y2yP1Kt3RtXBvBnSwHqH Iw0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyl9iZlhD1hcb7kapvRpjxNBPUO9/VA3LtvmAWY/mZpaNebRW59 EwApw14o0pFig8UbMv0dL8alhahgwe4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHC5/pXIw8sJsoVMeBePitsXP98bJoIqTLkMa5jJp7amDmRhOz7Ke47pKLWeD4IpQelDwXdnw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9214:b0:175:565c:b07f with SMTP id d20-20020a056358921400b00175565cb07fmr1272014rwb.43.1704291332641; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 06:15:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:::1? ([2406:5900:1038:12bf:c861:d965:4cd9:8ddf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v21-20020a634815000000b005c1ce3c960bsm22166693pga.50.2024.01.03.06.15.31 for <acme@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 06:15:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:15:27 +0900
From: Seo Suchan <tjtncks@gmail.com>
To: acme@ietf.org
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1Oe1PNRse8nnj=YURU6FX+hoA4O7Jid=8N+K8D_KnZosyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200414105445.DA392F4071E@rfc-editor.org> <CAGgd1Oe1PNRse8nnj=YURU6FX+hoA4O7Jid=8N+K8D_KnZosyA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <EE1DF596-662F-406F-ABC5-33592F5258F6@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----O8A636DZVK9MCSG7F53PCE6CZJJKGD"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/wfZhBNw6Hc4hW0G1WPP1iUKk1dg>
Subject: Re: [Acme] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6104)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 14:15:38 -0000

It's about line changes, errata added line change between type: and it's body

On 2024년 1월 3일 오후 9시 11분 18초 GMT+09:00, Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> 작성함:
>Yet another errata....  My old eyes don't see what the change is.  All the
>brackets look lined up the same in both original and corrected.  If someone
>can point out where the change is, we can move this along. Or we reject
>it.
>
>Deb
>
>On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:19 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
>wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
>> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6104
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Theodor Nolte <nolte@dfn-cert.de>
>>
>> Section: 6.7.1
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>    in the problem document.
>>
>> HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
>> Content-Type: application/problem+json
>> Link: <https://example.com/acme/directory>;rel="index"
>>
>> {
>>     "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:malformed",
>>     "detail": "Some of the identifiers requested were rejected",
>>     "subproblems": [
>>         {
>>             "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:malformed",
>>             "detail": "Invalid underscore in DNS name \"_example.org\"",
>>             "identifier": {
>>                 "type": "dns",
>>                 "value": "_example.org"
>>             }
>>         },
>>         {
>>             "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:rejectedIdentifier",
>>             "detail": "This CA will not issue for \"example.net\"",
>>             "identifier": {
>>                 "type": "dns",
>>                 "value": "example.net"
>>             }
>>         }
>>     ]
>> }
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>    in the problem document.
>>
>>    HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
>>    Content-Type: application/problem+json
>>    Link: <https://example.com/acme/directory>;rel="index"
>>
>>    {
>>        "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:malformed",
>>        "detail": "Some of the identifiers requested were rejected",
>>        "subproblems": [
>>            {
>>                "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:malformed",
>>                "detail": "Invalid underscore in DNS name \"_example.org
>> \"",
>>                "identifier": {
>>                    "type": "dns",
>>                    "value": "_example.org"
>>                }
>>            },
>>            {
>>                "type": "urn:ietf:params:acme:error:rejectedIdentifier",
>>                "detail": "This CA will not issue for \"example.net\"",
>>                "identifier": {
>>                    "type": "dns",
>>                    "value": "example.net"
>>                }
>>            }
>>        ]
>>    }
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> The code block of the HTTP reply is not aligned.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
>> Publication Date    : March 2019
>> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>