Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 21:30 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3898120372 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZCVlFJPk2CML for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CB41202A7 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id k20so92705352ios.10 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OfcQoD27fKdGqMRQS7v1gDjV16WIGyAQmfucNrMmjbY=; b=Vd2lEyW8m1yeBBz71FE4/j9gTbSBgSV81yA4KGWEwbQ9EtIYd5ckexteMRAQu+R8Pb nanLmXo9iRs7CZP+hWCMqSnxdsH0uTRhpBnblr76z3G9VsGi7BkyC6UkRlU7WKxorGtH UtyHJdyEWrn1KmgyD1cZAp3XEq9POdqOFTXzwtY1HPt5ROcwbZ/9EOHJQYtGbZCnZS7g 1G0ZqobjBwJrOX+TSiisD+6MDmf2OPhPAlQJKM+6eBnbLr+JAm3RhSHP+n7v7btxUGTg g489hYmQoWYD/JuoaiqMAaWmOklIhnVOqOFa0uvWrVq8RWOUcNOV+mvMXhXitVaUtRa3 0+CQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OfcQoD27fKdGqMRQS7v1gDjV16WIGyAQmfucNrMmjbY=; b=W/7B1BKkc/FER37OI7pdR3Jrt29sFlua8dEnF8FevtlN71fyCXbskHcXmBMuuOYjY2 CGFY9dbmP8YblicRuaLS3bHcvgEGwWHm4SvKHOu3udhzkgSplyfDne+bUZExQy2uiQJG Rhtm97QLMER5k7LgNLEKUFsVJuG33vqrprX2LZwWzQDtpVc409Yu+9gtMR+toYo1nlDa YkDmy89T560MSsZwhKH5SQwLwbMEwF/CcJ6Kjq6Di7kOtyXg4KH3iv3lpweDZLjWbel5 JHtqIyBXAcu64R6qlDkFeaVFEz8YSVjEgNR9o+ijjIcQJ4kqZo2+D3dcXkDfU2WexsUE +M1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV0nMb1GMgymCeagKCxy9EIkcW8WaZuixt/44s3WmAXWun5Mhu3 xOuJl5J5UeEQ5dU3ZtpcbSFtxMF/gScWTj5dAus=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyqefUCG84E1KgllGfXrzFC1sV8Dfrhm2K4PCfhhT1TuM/9ZDbM00CkSkAdDBP2JnGrjjkm9aWLOkn3AsNoJD0=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6d07:: with SMTP id a7mr13729239iod.254.1564003807273; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190724165643.GA29051@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <2457067b-49fe-c2cf-d554-95f524573eea@gmail.com> <5009606a-4fcb-92c7-85c6-208d359147c8@nic.cz> <590021BB-6BA8-4CDB-8537-6335498C63E2@nohats.ca> <CAH1iCiqv=rYN3Va+qaQk1ypquT_R+FvavKU_-01u2q8=VUP8Bw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCiqv=rYN3Va+qaQk1ypquT_R+FvavKU_-01u2q8=VUP8Bw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:29:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyGZ3aUP4yfQHZ+97WQ0mdt6TyUYVprKVw=uLHVrSw1dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Vladimír Čunát <vladimir.cunat+ietf@nic.cz>, Thomas Peterson <nosretep.samoht@gmail.com>, add@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c2863058e740399"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/pffMoG2MMmvmWbQsb4T8I5MQQWs>
Subject: Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:30:10 -0000
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 2:07 PM Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote: > > And just to complete the picture for those less familiar with DNSSEC and > DANE: > I think it would be good to define some terms here. DNSSEC was first standardized in 1999, as RFC 2535. It was then obsoleted in 2005 by RFCs 4033-4035. DANE is RFC 6698, standardized in 2012. thanks, Rob
- [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Jim Reid
- Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Thomas Peterson
- Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Paul Wouters
- Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Brian Dickson
- Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Rob Sayre
- Re: [Add] Not a good BoF meeting Vladimír Čunát