IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [Ext] Validity of network administrator role

"Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de> Thu, 15 August 2019 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F562120118 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AedOOoqEVpBr for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (smtp.guxx.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:322c::25:42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC28120105 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id 2A9595F42D3C; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:52:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.19.152.108] (p54B8ABDF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.184.171.223]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 140C45F42C87; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:52:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Neil Cook <neil.cook@open-xchange.com>, Patrik Fältström <paf=40frobbit.se@dmarc.ietf.org>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>, Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:52:27 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <0B87FCD7-79C5-4EFF-B2CD-46325FE745F1@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <D38C2E5B-0D38-4F0D-B581-DE2231E473B0@fugue.com>
References: <CABcZeBPfud1YsSEbK3fXpRVr=gQxUE+JkfZ5X14q=prb+-WOGQ@mail.gmail.com> <D38C2E5B-0D38-4F0D-B581-DE2231E473B0@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/uAHHoiBimAu4pbIba7QkqjB0QT0>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Validity of network administrator role
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:52:33 -0000

Moin!

On 15 Aug 2019, at 15:57, Ted Lemon wrote:

> Silly question. We’re talking about how it would be nice to document 
> the issues that will come up as a result of DoH being in the wild, and 
> perhaps the solutions people propose, whether they are recommended by 
> the IETF or not.
>
> Is anyone in fact writing that document?
I seem to recall we had two drafts presented in the first add session ( 
draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues and 
draft-reid-operator-doh) which already captured a lot of the concern. I 
would hope that we continue to work on them within the framework that is 
yet to be setup by the IETF leadership.

So long
-Ralf
—--
Ralf Weber

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email