IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [Ext] Validity of network administrator role

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 15 August 2019 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B999D1200D5 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VTDoE0PNNDuS for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AE0B1200E5 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id m2so2023814qkd.10 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=JbAgLgYfwvVPfzRRgaKOTr296e69UcCv0J+qDTpAPmg=; b=iXzy9NKTdG8Kbh1b4spehqAJfhAMz60fsYClTWDcSWfj7mMFeoZj/NHdDBARVQWLP0 yMjNBxJOWr+nWWvKbRYd10VHvSUy04ModFFOi/pyW8g8oW3cxxe+LiVFDH09lSapG1Dx JVCJVcAmHXz/DAM2wrJNosCi0oyxsVYZhOzryKGCdBcG5A8IP3EmyZUXUAT++BhF9NPg XxG4wpCMfloQ6dA6WNINnhWN4X57HzmlrcppXaMaSpDUD0+z1+/9ohsGgSeyTakLZi0R 75abCvoIWp27ce+flYlVCgNGbB3WgrkOQRwcZQDmmhcwQNV/4NrfmtbBL+DZ4HYu8yz6 D76A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=JbAgLgYfwvVPfzRRgaKOTr296e69UcCv0J+qDTpAPmg=; b=NUvsCyizgxL+zEiyy2PBqdH+4DJwqvDOwbiNAJeJW9PMxbDXkvJ4T2/P645WWRgGOB Us9k26Zmye0PXNPdr75elmCKWsMy02voqkAsz1vWfE6rOFrSqbM7H6Zre23Aa/1Nau65 9mamS85UnFFuCzuypbH5+OFjWNFazt2aFCPmyLP+ueNz83Lf5sGsmUYDFSF1k1R6V5zR B6iz8wlzaSgwYAUj1miI1KOqD+IaKWsL+nH+nbNTL9hal3ARwScVKcvEJ+tCJtCnxn6b d0W/FCbRc4EOsPQCMGWfTsWYfyIrQe4O3Y7IEQtW3J7oNkjAJN53VPYMN+DO39kKXUEg otOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUU4jgKxus7FTPd/KdAnJ9Q247OcZ/mBaVNsA8RRHcuzCQK9t5z K2nhwQXS0Lw9U764R+bamP+JfA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzFqYRaAfqaPSOyh4jYOwxjvc8RiIuBODut7OeS1pWYW7sAVE/eZTMXO2HvFZyaIm9FZhASUw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4747:: with SMTP id u68mr4481162qka.42.1565881207046; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:c1a2:1:9128:e34:f62c:61a4? ([2001:470:c1a2:1:9128:e34:f62c:61a4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f9sm1580653qkm.51.2019.08.15.08.00.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B22255B9-E930-4972-8C87-214EC5C25CE9@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EBFB954F-3BAC-4387-8D55-44E2FDBB4DA0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:00:04 -0700
In-Reply-To: <0B87FCD7-79C5-4EFF-B2CD-46325FE745F1@fl1ger.de>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Neil Cook <neil.cook@open-xchange.com>, Patrik Fältström <paf=40frobbit.se@dmarc.ietf.org>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>, Bret Jordan <jordan.ietf@gmail.com>, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
References: <CABcZeBPfud1YsSEbK3fXpRVr=gQxUE+JkfZ5X14q=prb+-WOGQ@mail.gmail.com> <D38C2E5B-0D38-4F0D-B581-DE2231E473B0@fugue.com> <0B87FCD7-79C5-4EFF-B2CD-46325FE745F1@fl1ger.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/ydtRTMRAdo9cZ_0irvwVmG-xyj4>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Validity of network administrator role
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:00:13 -0000

On Aug 15, 2019, at 7:52 AM, Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> wrote:
> I seem to recall we had two drafts presented in the first add session ( draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues and draft-reid-operator-doh) which already captured a lot of the concern. I would hope that we continue to work on them within the framework that is yet to be setup by the IETF leadership.

I think these documents were views from the authors’ perspectives on the topic.  What I’m talking about is more a collection of the discussion of the whole group, rather than a single coherent view, no matter how interesting that might be.

I mention this because we keep going back over territory we’d already covered.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email