[Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 03 June 2009 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B62B3A69D1 for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.351, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yi432nGJwjU1 for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8CE3A687D for <adslmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n53B4RRl029449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n53B4Q9L029447; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:04:26 -0700
Message-Id: <200906031104.n53B4Q9L029447@boreas.isi.edu>
To: rray@pesa.com, Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com, dromasca@avaya.com, rbonica@juniper.net, sneedmike@hotmail.com, Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
Cc: adslmib@ietf.org, smadar_t@rad.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
X-BeenThere: adslmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/adslmib>
List-Post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:07:00 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3728, "Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3728&eid=1791 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Smadar Tauber <smadar_t@rad.com> Section: Global Original Text ------------- UNITS definition of the following MIB objects, should change from dBm to dB. That will also fix the conflict with the units appearing in the Description of these MIB objects (dB). vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn vdslPhysCurrAtn vdslLineConfDownMaxSnrMgn vdslLineConfDownMinSnrMgn vdslLineConfDownTargetSnrMgn vdslLineConfUpMaxSnrMgn vdslLineConfUpMinSnrMgn vdslLineConfUpTargetSnrMgn Example of original text: vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (-127..127) UNITS "0.25dBm" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its received signal in 0.25dB. The effective range is -31.75 to +31.75 dB." REFERENCE "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec" ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 } Corrected Text -------------- Example of corrected text: vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 (-127..127) UNITS "0.25dB" MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its received signal in 0.25dB. The effective range is -31.75 to +31.75 dB." REFERENCE "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec" ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 } Notes ----- This Errata replaces errata 1788 (rejected because it did not include list of all MIB objects having this problem and could not be edited). It was decided by the adslmib Forum, that the solution should be as described by this Errata. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3728 (draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl-12) -------------------------------------- Title : Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL) Publication Date : February 2004 Author(s) : B. Ray, R. Abbi Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : ADSL MIB Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Smadar Tauber
- [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (17… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Menachem Dodge