Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
Smadar Tauber <smadar_t@rad.com> Wed, 03 June 2009 11:52 UTC
Return-Path: <smadar_t@rad.com>
X-Original-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BCA3A6ACA for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hp8kDIRvBOAF for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from antivir2.rad.co.il (antivir2.rad.co.il [62.0.23.221]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71E13A67D8 for <adslmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exrad4.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.47]) by antivir2.rad.co.il with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2009 14:52:01 +0300
Received: from exrad4.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.47]) by exrad4.ad.rad.co.il ([192.114.24.47]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:52:01 +0300
From: Smadar Tauber <smadar_t@rad.com>
To: Menachem Dodge <Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com>, "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "rray@pesa.com" <rray@pesa.com>, "Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com" <Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com>, "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "sneedmike@hotmail.com" <sneedmike@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:51:59 +0300
Thread-Topic: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
Thread-Index: AcnkPySEMlLVzAE2Q767eIh7m3DwhgAAFi4QAACLBdA=
Message-ID: <48E7911F78327A449A9FB95637667286116022EB@exrad4.ad.rad.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <283DD79798619346BF9B17D7B5035A19EC190E2F9D@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_48E7911F78327A449A9FB95637667286116022EBexrad4adradcoil_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:18:33 -0700
Cc: "adslmib@ietf.org" <adslmib@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
X-BeenThere: adslmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/adslmib>
List-Post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:52:33 -0000
Thanks all of you ! Smadar ________________________________ From: Menachem Dodge [mailto:Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 14:37 To: Bert Wijnen (IETF); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); RFC Errata System; rray@pesa.com; Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com; rbonica@juniper.net; sneedmike@hotmail.com Cc: adslmib@ietf.org; Smadar Tauber Subject: RE: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791) Dan, This is fine with me, as well. Thank you Smadar, for handling this. Best Regards, Menachem From: Bert Wijnen (IETF) [mailto:bertietf@bwijnen.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:33 PM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); RFC Errata System; rray@pesa.com; Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com; rbonica@juniper.net; sneedmike@hotmail.com; Menachem Dodge Cc: adslmib@ietf.org; smadar_t@rad.com Subject: Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791) I am fine with this new one. Bert ----- Original Message ----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)<mailto:dromasca@avaya.com> To: RFC Errata System<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> ; rray@pesa.com<mailto:rray@pesa.com> ; Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com<mailto:Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com> ; rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net> ; sneedmike@hotmail.com<mailto:sneedmike@hotmail.com> ; Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com<mailto:Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com> Cc: adslmib@ietf.org<mailto:adslmib@ietf.org> ; smadar_t@rad.com<mailto:smadar_t@rad.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791) Based on the previous discussions, unless I hear any objections in the next 24 hours I will approve this Errata Report by entering it in Verified state. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:04 PM > To: rray@pesa.com<mailto:rray@pesa.com>; Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com<mailto:Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com>; Romascanu, Dan > (Dan); rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>; sneedmike@hotmail.com<mailto:sneedmike@hotmail.com>; > Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com<mailto:Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com> > Cc: smadar_t@rad.com<mailto:smadar_t@rad.com>; adslmib@ietf.org<mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> > Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791) > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3728, > "Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital > Subscriber Lines (VDSL)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3728&eid=1791 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Smadar Tauber <smadar_t@rad.com<mailto:smadar_t@rad.com>> > > Section: Global > > Original Text > ------------- > UNITS definition of the following MIB objects, should change > from dBm to dB. > That will also fix the conflict with the units appearing in > the Description of these MIB objects (dB). > > vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn > vdslPhysCurrAtn > vdslLineConfDownMaxSnrMgn > vdslLineConfDownMinSnrMgn > vdslLineConfDownTargetSnrMgn > vdslLineConfUpMaxSnrMgn > vdslLineConfUpMinSnrMgn > vdslLineConfUpTargetSnrMgn > > Example of original text: > vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX Integer32 (-127..127) > UNITS "0.25dBm" > MAX-ACCESS read-only > STATUS current > DESCRIPTION > "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its > received signal in 0.25dB. The effective range is > -31.75 to +31.75 dB." > REFERENCE "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec" > ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 } > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Example of corrected text: > vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE > SYNTAX Integer32 (-127..127) > UNITS "0.25dB" > MAX-ACCESS read-only > STATUS current > DESCRIPTION > "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its > received signal in 0.25dB. The effective range is > -31.75 to +31.75 dB." > REFERENCE "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec" > ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 } > > > Notes > ----- > This Errata replaces errata 1788 (rejected because it did not > include list of all MIB objects having this problem and could > not be edited). > It was decided by the adslmib Forum, that the solution should > be as described by this Errata. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, > please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be > verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the > verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and > edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3728 (draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl-12) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Definitions of Managed Objects for Very > High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL) > Publication Date : February 2004 > Author(s) : B. Ray, R. Abbi > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : ADSL MIB > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ Adslmib mailing list Adslmib@ietf.org<mailto:Adslmib@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib ________________________________ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.51/2151 - Release Date: 06/02/09 17:53:00
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Smadar Tauber
- [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (17… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728… Menachem Dodge