Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 03 June 2009 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BC63A69D1 for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2DnH21BA+ZD for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30763A693D for <adslmib@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,298,1241409600"; d="scan'208";a="147517373"
Received: from unknown (HELO nj300815-nj-erheast.avaya.com) ([198.152.6.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2009 07:09:56 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.14]) by nj300815-nj-erheast-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2009 07:09:55 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:09:49 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04017573BE@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <200906031104.n53B4Q9L029447@boreas.isi.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
Thread-Index: AcnkO16//YQptTISTq+3egSTsbyMsQAADK2A
References: <200906031104.n53B4Q9L029447@boreas.isi.edu>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, rray@pesa.com, Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com, rbonica@juniper.net, sneedmike@hotmail.com, Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com
Cc: adslmib@ietf.org, smadar_t@rad.com
Subject: Re: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
X-BeenThere: adslmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/adslmib>
List-Post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:09:58 -0000

Based on the previous discussions, unless I hear any objections in the
next 24 hours I will approve this Errata Report by entering it in
Verified state. 

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:04 PM
> To: rray@pesa.com; Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com; Romascanu, Dan 
> (Dan); rbonica@juniper.net; sneedmike@hotmail.com; 
> Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com
> Cc: smadar_t@rad.com; adslmib@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1791)
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3728, 
> "Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital 
> Subscriber Lines (VDSL)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3728&eid=1791
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Smadar Tauber <smadar_t@rad.com>
> 
> Section: Global
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> UNITS definition of the following MIB objects, should change 
> from dBm to dB.
> That will also fix the conflict with the units appearing in 
> the Description of these MIB objects (dB).
> 
> vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn
> vdslPhysCurrAtn
> vdslLineConfDownMaxSnrMgn
> vdslLineConfDownMinSnrMgn
> vdslLineConfDownTargetSnrMgn
> vdslLineConfUpMaxSnrMgn
> vdslLineConfUpMinSnrMgn
> vdslLineConfUpTargetSnrMgn
> 
> Example of original text:
>    vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE
>        SYNTAX       Integer32 (-127..127)
>        UNITS        "0.25dBm"
>        MAX-ACCESS   read-only
>        STATUS       current
>        DESCRIPTION
>            "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its
>            received signal in 0.25dB.  The effective range is
>            -31.75 to +31.75 dB."
>        REFERENCE    "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec"
>         ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Example of corrected text:
>    vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE
>        SYNTAX       Integer32 (-127..127)
>        UNITS        "0.25dB"
>        MAX-ACCESS   read-only
>        STATUS       current
>        DESCRIPTION
>            "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its
>            received signal in 0.25dB.  The effective range is
>            -31.75 to +31.75 dB."
>        REFERENCE    "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec"
>         ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 }
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> This Errata replaces errata 1788 (rejected because it did not 
> include list of all MIB objects having this problem and could 
> not be edited). 
> It was decided by the adslmib Forum, that the solution should 
> be as described by this Errata.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, 
> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be 
> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the 
> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and 
> edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3728 (draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Definitions of Managed Objects for Very 
> High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)
> Publication Date    : February 2004
> Author(s)           : B. Ray, R. Abbi
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : ADSL MIB
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>