IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-19: (with DISCUSS)

Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com> Tue, 25 January 2022 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE853A0E5C; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 04:53:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ey8Ax3bocZ0v; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 04:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F9933A0E5B; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 04:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id w11so7549742wra.4; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 04:53:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yBGO5f/zfPiRagqXqEbJ912uuicoBTeQLeVeEQqgjuM=; b=Qs+67E9OSAOjdMhLGHBuFeFhba5UxZHh8xTAkPGPKWk/qIIC4DEmxcqXEYDVxapSK5 Uw3JHVhzajLWGF0t5mlCWLBHkMETJKCEYI1f/vsCWKI1cbHCk/qHsnU8oOxLLjV8BpEv jbnE6UHEyiGGGYwgsbyRapKHgzRdXEe0fpsNWxgPtFtc931UtkD4YCAyVOeSzzkGhtkj Hti1GnCb9B1F4POiJUcZaf5JUPTjCpJ9Mnc8X0rAGVZi0e4PPqJXXJUgnTUsFIRaBjQU iNiPtC1cIuVi9kqvbKhS+ND53yJHriOMY+awlFphqs7oqM4baWFZkAzbLLooVWOREn/4 GmlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yBGO5f/zfPiRagqXqEbJ912uuicoBTeQLeVeEQqgjuM=; b=5kHuFOrhkMLTkGuSEIZQEjVLRMh+mqDTpxT/3JN4Tsa49Lcjgs4cepRSiGmUbDi43X d617UmmneryYTWj73oiTHBuR2Y+fmd6Lzl3zEZOgRNz3rcFJ1Wx7wfJeqOXSpPdvUARv TqVHtmpw9wXZc5jRjQH29TGkimgQKwqWKCJhQ9KPYllEB04V/FLEcwKse25AzJ8xzSgq sssaKUHGfDiBEexEiOuHDcThqYYOgGVoivbaNCbcXroR2KYEk5m7YZ7+QNCEFP8B3Q0B QvlxgMUdjVkf4AEnW9A9JPwddY3+dWui6bpZVS2Tuiv1lKPdIjyJQkiPW9TBhC5blqC1 8Msg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53274ZG3tvI2dI6PNFDoBUK+CunJtVwbBJgXJscQtVLq9gImCA/5 rfbU1f1Spfl7jyT6f/5D67h0JGRLERPRutdmqBtmDnRETVbhXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnYL//Gu+kmW/pHmI0GQCIxpJoS0CW/tnFrRpkzi5A+CTYX1iGU7M3wLzsS7Kryf6JAinfkDkygPmaYw5+WuU=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4cc5:: with SMTP id c5mr17891233wrt.567.1643115220204; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 04:53:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164243218525.21999.10847898425419573015@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <164243218525.21999.10847898425419573015@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:53:29 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAbpuypVPrdpmvGuA3pjR_8mrsQvO2yc3wFQuXEdoScTP-hfsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, alto-chairs <alto-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000006818605d6679341"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Ek1QGzf8btpUgdUFV_Gsh2RNqyw>
Subject: Re: [alto] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-19: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:53:48 -0000

Hi Francesca,

Thanks for pointing the remaining comments out. The new version is
available now:

IETF datatracker status page:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto/
HTML version:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-20.html
A diff from the previous version:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-20

Please let me know if you have any other comments.

Thanks,
Jensen


On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:09 PM Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-19: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you for the work on this document, and for partly addressing my
> previous
> DISCUSS.
>
> Many thanks to Thomas Fossati for his in-depth review:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/MKG2Cdin96WLcksnA6nAu6pvThM/ ,
> and to
> Alexey Melnikov for his media-types review:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/uGakYYYPVjBEwei9isTaluPwhDE/
> .
>
> Only 2 small changes noted by Alexey are still missing - quoting the
> relevant
> text in his mail
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/LU4gHAY4fQZ6vK7rh8pdSfDwTO0/
> :
>
> 1. >>     Also when you split the registration template into 2 it would be
>    >>     good to have a sentence here explaining how the two formats
> differ.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion. Could you kindly give us some further
> > examples about what should be explained? Do we need to explain the
> > different cases where the two subtypes should be used, or just explain
> > the difference between the two registration forms?
>
> The former. If I as an implementor read the registration, I need to
> decide whether or not I should implement processing of this particular
> media type.
>
> 2. I've just realized that you are also missing "Fragment identifier
> considerations:" field after this one. (See RFC 6838) Having it as "N/A"
> is fine.
>
> Francesca
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email