IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector

Dawn Chan <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com> Fri, 23 February 2018 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6AD124B0A for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:31:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.125
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zeCgeVM2tXD2 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092006080.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.6.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AADAD124234 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:31:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=3lDxGVLGes2SlIxXQRFZQcv8JSSEev8VMLmS3bKxNUA=; b=QDzPMLU7D/2/lZ5JM3ZTQzMYwn2xet1sN57ixfg3Fmu1IyvioaMONUrVAwpzbUiOj/ypMdyIclUhR9J/L0Po5a9kN08YjWe/D4iYyZgH8SHMFMmIxXFXm3dyXrAOkI0eySE7TiB1ii1eHSQglrMqNe8OD26bC2LYbZcbcgXkHaL3D2/24Pv82VmJYtWyuKdJAPChLSgoLPnNcw4CMPXrdneoLXOdsLGq4FOUyj0fpzIJXgO7oOxbWU82A33Ah0aN/XnYR/sas3ItMqwJeSh2WYGOt2OJA8Ee0RXkFE3pxfxrTa81tbUsXDLrd02hGf1J4E0/0DLSpyjlk5Ciy6yPGg==
Received: from BY2NAM03FT027.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.60) by BY2NAM03HT193.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.527.18; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:31:49 +0000
Received: from BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.84.51) by BY2NAM03FT027.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.237) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.527.18 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:31:49 +0000
Received: from BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f5e6:68f8:39a:2dae]) by BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f5e6:68f8:39a:2dae%14]) with mapi id 15.20.0506.023; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:31:48 +0000
From: Dawn Chan <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>, Wendy Roome <wendy@wdroome.com>, "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
CC: "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector
Thread-Index: AQHTrBG9Ct5bX1yzY0CbkuooR1WyWaOxh8cA
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:31:48 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR02MB1202578B8645F956E30B7066B5CC0@BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5e6a98ff-3c8d-f1b8-2deb-21788cdfef09@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e6a98ff-3c8d-f1b8-2deb-21788cdfef09@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:3FB278612398A40D584375C7E935BB9D7B36E677CC4B486D6C9AF0B74BFF59D5; UpperCasedChecksum:A81DA56DFB443A33517F7DC9A4191F6A52FF1370EBB5076B3D566843ED3CADE6; SizeAsReceived:7277; Count:47
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [eue0LPvkQXeBs6GJFmlqz3EcLybEHvQn6tzwOJaAsts=]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2NAM03HT193; 6:UMEOoB9nB2+e/tTDy0fMhuypvC1UQEZmXSJUuNr5H3FD+Vudcy2sEJVF5V/5vtYyYjwqoFnNdg1DkQUuC09SFvfiWQiGS2+FdfQho169lyepW9wr+ZSdsi+NvYUUh1XqvvujASQqrOSuaRTLj73IG5Uts4z8AXD79mWR/hym+e7M5RWOc2c72cadrhSvv8m3neKokgqb0kYANc2BDSvisab7exYLmz28Z62y+5ZAqVdqQzgNmLw2G4vtbunpLNUj6XrRimJ69qOWdpXaG0FKsbbVh7l4wE2Xirir7sV1IEkwrj8PPIP2gqUq+kOqZE1JoIDd4l29grgsN+pTyz/aoVTbUdHO1Jax8wnHje2nVzc=; 5:C1XhRmBjJfackhStNQWdf+H9JrLwIHjr0i6BR2h7gT3UYzTH600H4VkUc/bTx9uQl3AmWFmfzwo8WFcF3tkLvDW/mdZd0EUdvXnTN3TfFRyj0uO8IGQ67m3B4iYwQAfhJGqKvPFqwouaEwAYdqoBXkye9S1p3Z/u0R6mPuYLbi8=; 24:53yBJn8n0wFOH4ehZh1RxpRpx4xBtavxzbpiUJxDD8/4MOsmfPYXh/Z7Rmo9hhMXJXWe4V7pTwOKDPdhqCipkKFNjOHCtPSwhprb0KQBQ9c=; 7:pTXspJxOu30LQvnGg/YUqf2bme+HApb2vxoZDG3kXYkFso97tHsMMUJaQy/1dYjyX6p4aFB2CEk5JoArL/987I8MIpVb7pJmZ5HOw1gxaH7hPUdgAr1cj6vkHjsDYu/ldg1wJwaGp2Ce3Kpg6rFclxp44u2ej78GCOp13nfSxEKTnSAdUKnxHYa2DyBSn85W0EODq4Xdsp5aD+E7R23oyjhXDlRC+8PPUnNH81OYuIGjyPJo4qkysWZwvCfOZOvh
x-incomingheadercount: 47
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT193;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY2NAM03HT193:
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7e903ea3-a172-40f0-95c8-08d57a871d94
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(3231001)(444111074)(444112074); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT193; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2NAM03HT193;
x-forefront-prvs: 0592A9FDE6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2NAM03HT193; H:BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BLUPR02MB1202578B8645F956E30B7066B5CC0BLUPR02MB1202namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7e903ea3-a172-40f0-95c8-08d57a871d94
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Feb 2018 06:31:48.3712 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2NAM03HT193
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/LuyUIdNxa00DTJEiOElmEiQ6ZEM>
Subject: Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:31:53 -0000

Hi all,

Draft Unified Property is quite stable at the moment, and the major problem left is whether the cellular address needs to be appended. Actually, since the Unified Property maintains an entity domain registry to achieve extensibility so that we suggest the new entity domain cellular address to be registered in the https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses-01.txt itself. This way, the draft Unified Property can proceed first.

Besides, path-vector and unified property depend on each other so they should move as a bundle.

Do you think this is a feasible solution?

On 23 Feb 2018, at 3:16 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com<mailto:vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>> wrote:

All: In preparation for moving the unified property draft [0] ahead, the
minutes of the December 2017 Virtual Interim Meeting [1] indicate that
the chairs seek answers to the following questions from the WG:

(1) Are cellular addresses an important abstraction that the working
group will like to introduce in ALTO?  Currently, cellular address
format is specified in a companion draft [2].

(2) If yes, is the unified-props-new draft the correct place to add the
cellular representation?

Please note that the unified property draft [0] gates path-vector [3],
as there is a dependency of path-vector on unified-props.  Thus, the
plan is to move these two drafts ahead as a bundle.

Which means that we need to reach a conclusion on the questions posed
above so unified-props and path-vector can move ahead.

Please express an substantive opinion on the above questions in the
mailing list.

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new/
[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2017-alto-01/materials/minutes-interim-2017-alto-01-201712180600/
[2]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-path-vector/

Thank you,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani / vijay.gurbani@nokia.com
Network Data Science, Nokia Networks
Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email