Re: [alto] Call for Adoption: draft-bw-alto-cost-mode-01

Thanks Kai,

I had a quick look at the draft: it is blissfully short!

Looks to me that this document is needed and should be adopted.

Two small points in Section 4:

I think you should add a "description" to the registry for each cost mode.

Please don't use BCP14 language in the IANA section. So...
OLD
   New values MUST be assigned after IETF Review (Section 4.8 of
   [RFC8126]).
NEW
   The assignment policy for this registry is "IETF Review" [RFC8126].
END

Thanks,
Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of kaigao@scu.edu.cn
Sent: 07 March 2022 11:28
To: alto@ietf.org; alto-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [alto] Call for Adoption: draft-bw-alto-cost-mode-01

Dear all,

I have been appointed to run the Call for Adoption of
draft-bw-alto-cost-mode-01.

Following up with what has been proposed and agreed during the IESG review
on draft-ietf-alto-path-vector [1], we are starting a call for adoption of
the ALTO cost mode [2] document as a charter deliverable. It both helps push
forward existing WG document and fits in the protocol maintenance item in
the current charter.

The Call for Adoption will close on March 21 (2 weeks after the IETF
submission deadline). Please post to the mailing list if you support or
appose the adoption, or have any comments or suggestions.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/WWoyJyM0PioBWM_rADYT-Z_I8t4/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bw-alto-cost-mode-01

Thanks!

Best,
Kai
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto