[Anima-bootstrap] notes from 3/3

"Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com> Thu, 03 March 2016 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pritikin@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADEE1B2CD9 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:02:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.507
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8G1LmXvqrDHj for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E401B2CDA for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:02:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1960; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1457042545; x=1458252145; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=J14m7/ClxJ8oGabDZN4r1PzBlG/e1WsnEgSq+ZSIiec=; b=CLL/X2h1V5zNkg7GNN0US1aZJkiFAvBPycBkolUgTqrqMCiwX3Dnefb9 l9C4/5Cre+fbDyJJ8LJWmri1jGYPjv+FJCfw4dUGwv9LP2EKHw6mTVaPl 9MChjQdTFCFzjwqAGy10TT+HMnuV4FlRLHuIhP/1EmH2TasGJbMuhDnUX g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BBBQCvs9hW/40NJK1dgzpSc7o7gWqGL?= =?us-ascii?q?YEWOhIBAQEBAQEBZBwLhEgjEVcBIgImAgQwFRIECogqnD6PXY50AQEBAQEFAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBF3uHCwiJfiuBDwWXHAGNYoFgjReFdohWAScOLYNkiQ5+AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,533,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="245309106"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Mar 2016 22:02:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com []) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u23M2OoT011207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:02:24 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com ( by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:02:23 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com ([]) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:02:23 -0600
From: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>
To: "anima-bootstrap@ietf.org" <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: notes from 3/3
Thread-Index: AQHRdZhdA3GT4VQMIkae3QSrruhIHg==
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:02:23 +0000
Message-ID: <FDA042A3-28EB-49BE-9441-1C58DFB41766@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9A4D3E9DFF3F12449E82487EE7FE21FC@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/MwbY6O7AOraBvRgi7boPOFHwY-Q>
Subject: [Anima-bootstrap] notes from 3/3
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 22:02:26 -0000

raw notes from the call today. Plan is to update doc as per these and push the -02 (to obtain more formal feedback) early next week.


- max


intended to call out that fragmentation issues make this fail on deployments that can’t handle that. such as the LLN that SHOULD NOT. 

it isn’t the protocol -- its the necessary size of the messages. 

section 3.2.3
move I-D reference to the top of section.

need text indicating that communication between proxy and registar is up to the proxy and the registrar. 
we need to state the ‘mandatory to implement’ protocol.
need 3.2.x “how proxy discovers registrar needs to be indicated”
	need an equivalent statement about how the registrar responds to that.

need to make it clear that the proxy is not terminating the CoAP connection

we maintain 3.2.1 and 3.22 so we support HTTP and CoAP and we’ll need to add sections in 5.x how to encapsulate into CoAP with block transfer.
Add section and text w/ pointers about how to use CoAP and block transfer. black transfer should be going into last call. 

the registrar MUST accept the CONNECT. 

need section describing how the proxy discovers the register 
	using GRASP is possibility
	the proxy will discover the address of the registrar through reference
	(prefix allocation document might provide a more complex example. ours should be easier).