IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 03 February 2023 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD34DC15952A for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbjuOA5ebey2 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B850C15EB2E for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (dynamic-046-114-158-105.46.114.pool.telefonica.de [46.114.158.105]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F7F1F4BD for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:06:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 335FBA1E4A; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 03:59:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F62A1DEF for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:59:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: anima@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <tencent_7EE6B5F96DFE42B84F752364@qq.com>
References: <tencent_60984BB55FBEF6DB66EC162D@qq.com> <1830744.1675280076@dyas> <tencent_7EE6B5F96DFE42B84F752364@qq.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "=?utf-8?B?U2hlbmcgSmlhbmc=?=" <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn> message dated "Thu, 02 Feb 2023 15:13:22 +0800."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:59:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2003538.1675414797@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/8TefGB58W1Suxmw8h0Yysdk4WuI>
Subject: Re: [Anima] WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:06:12 -0000

(Sheng's new email puts html in both the text/html and the text/plain parts)

>>>>> "SJ" == Michael&nbsp;Richardson  <nbsp> writes:
    SJ> In general, I don't have preference whether this document of
    SJ> rfc8366bis defines YANG components. The major differency would be
    SJ> rfc8366bis would depend on the brski-prm document. That could means
    SJ> rfc8366bis could not be published as RFC until brshi-prm published.

This is not a *preference* question, it's a quesiton of YANG mechanisms.
What we were doing was NOT going to work, and I feel that we avoided a major
issue by catching this now.

Andy has weighed in to both tell us we don't have to do it this way, and also
to say that we do have to do that.  I conclude that we have not had enough
review from sufficiently invested YANG experts.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email