IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 03 February 2023 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42940C15EB2E for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:05:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pyx4smGy6yu for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32061C15952A for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 01:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (dynamic-046-114-158-105.46.114.pool.telefonica.de [46.114.158.105]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973351F4A3 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0EB22A1E4C; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 04:01:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D142A1DEF for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:01:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: anima@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <DU0PR10MB51962622F18AA11338412C44F3D69@DU0PR10MB5196.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <tencent_60984BB55FBEF6DB66EC162D@qq.com> <1830744.1675280076@dyas> <tencent_7EE6B5F96DFE42B84F752364@qq.com> <DU0PR10MB51962622F18AA11338412C44F3D69@DU0PR10MB5196.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Comments: In-reply-to "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com> message dated "Thu, 02 Feb 2023 07:28:52 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 10:01:24 +0100
Message-ID: <2003827.1675414884@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/ebr3JUAcOzib_bJfkoIEI9MBaQ4>
Subject: Re: [Anima] WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:05:07 -0000

Fries, Steffen <steffen.fries@siemens.com> wrote:
    > Just to chime in here, my understanding was that we collect all known
    > requirements for vouchers in RFC8366bis hoping that we covered all to
    > avoid increasing complexity during augmentation of the voucher.

It's not about complexity.

It's about it actually just being wrong.
None of us are really generating code from the YANG, so we aren't seeing the failures.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email