IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Call for adoption: draft-dang-anima-network-service-auto-deployment

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 17 November 2021 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CFD3A0CD2 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 05:02:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hHBdwYovPHER for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 05:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487493A0CE0 for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 05:02:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD5618042; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:04:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tZXpRXXRr_BL; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:04:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DB118020; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:04:33 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1637154273; bh=nbfZBmviFCgj0BRtclk3umRdwCOApTBOhU5sD6cF+mM=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=VpVSpUQaaDnqnXrD6OCnlyd57GSsP+EiVTNUD5mBIesQE4yxFhpg24GS4FbtFKpHi Mpj/v0UliYkF3an9lelVT1dCrp0RGH8fAgOYoWlo9tcefxFonmfPmu90Cr3wNowNqd oQpfryazHhjmH2RIVIcOobuPIJx5pTHJAUrQj4d2cnQGkyhTjxqduC58Sw0jw8gpGB R/70CAx3J4vcPuabn1JdnfZ0RhAen8JDNBPujKj21ptkFGMPc/DjzGVt8LRXAP7ztl nzVON2t/6AopOIxE3Z2xBw8lsEZJxEv2qHnwbr4Tl2zpsYB04P4bW+x2L1tfRD/uah MHtLsh54I+RfA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CED8D5; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:02:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <YZMUt21i6qVWNJka@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <YZMUt21i6qVWNJka@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:02:08 -0500
Message-ID: <23800.1637154128@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/eKXTKOEoMP2VdFHrHdbZ_r5LIoQ>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Call for adoption: draft-dang-anima-network-service-auto-deployment
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:02:19 -0000

I'd like to know a bit more about the plans for
draft-dang-anima-network-service-auto-deployment

The document says:

   The original purpose of this document was to validate the design of
   the Autonomic Networking Infrastructure (ANI) for a realistic use
   case.
...
   The goal of this document is to complete the resource-based self-
   adaptation among service and network nodes via GRASP.  And this
   document is not a complete functional specification of an autonomic
   system of Resource-based Network Services Auto-deployment, and it
   does not describe all detailed aspects of the GRASP objective
   parameters and Autonomic Service Agent (ASA) procedures necessary to
   build a complete system.  Instead, it describes the architectural
   framework utilizing the components of the ANI, outlines the different
   deployment options and aspects, and defines GRASP objectives for use
   in building the system.  It also provides some basic parameter
   examples.

What I'm reading is that this is a paper exercise and that no code or
deployment will occur.  I'm not sure why we'd publish this as an RFC.

It's the part after "instead" that really concerns me.
I'd like to see this implemented.



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email