Re:Another AT MIB+!
Robert_Jeckell@3mail.3com.com Fri, 30 April 1993 16:47 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07736; 30 Apr 93 12:47 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07732; 30 Apr 93 12:47 EDT
Received: from cayman.cayman.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16517; 30 Apr 93 12:47 EDT
Received: by cayman.Cayman.COM (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA08943; Fri, 30 Apr 93 12:20:33 EDT
Return-Path: <Robert_Jeckell@3mail.3com.com>
Received: from gatekeeper.3Com.COM by cayman.Cayman.COM (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA08939; Fri, 30 Apr 93 12:20:31 EDT
Received: from gw.3Com.COM by gatekeeper.3Com.COM with SMTP id AA21977 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4-910725 for <apple-ip@cayman.com>); Fri, 30 Apr 1993 09:20:26 -0700
Received: by gw.3Com.COM id AA19604 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4); Fri, 30 Apr 1993 09:20:24 -0700
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1993 09:21:00 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Robert_Jeckell@3mail.3com.com
Subject: Re:Another AT MIB+!
To: KUANG1@applelink.apple.com
Cc: apple-ip@cayman.com
Message-Id: <930430.092220@3Mail.3Com.COM>
In-Reply-To: Message from {KUANG1@applelink.apple.com}:... of 4-29-93
Date: 30 Apr 93 03:18 GMT
From: KUANG1@applelink.apple.com (Kuang, Fidelia)
Over a week ago, I suggested that we return the onHold text back to the
AppleTalk MIB+ to make it easier for folks to monitor zone changing (which
I know you folks are probably tired of by now...). From the relative
silence, I gather than only John Norstad and maybe Tom Evans agree with
this. Is this accurate? As you probably know, the latest version does not
mention onHold. If you feel that onHold should be brought back, please
speak up now, preferably before Karen submits the draft!
Fidelia Kuang
I would like to see onHold back in.
/bob
- Re:Another AT MIB+! Kuang, Fidelia
- Re:Another AT MIB+! Robert_Jeckell