Re:Another AT MIB+!
"Kuang, Fidelia" <KUANG1@applelink.apple.com> Fri, 30 April 1993 04:32 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19502; 30 Apr 93 0:32 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19498; 30 Apr 93 0:32 EDT
Received: from cayman.cayman.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11735; 30 Apr 93 0:32 EDT
Received: by cayman.Cayman.COM (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA19063; Thu, 29 Apr 93 23:46:06 EDT
Return-Path: <KUANG1@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Received: from guardian.apple.com by cayman.Cayman.COM (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA19059; Thu, 29 Apr 93 23:46:04 EDT
Received: from [90.1.0.8] by guardian.apple.com with SMTP (5.65/7-Aug-1992-eef) id AA27197; Thu, 29 Apr 93 20:42:10 -0700 for
Received: by alink-gw.apple.com (921113.SGI.UNSUPPORTED_PROTOTYPE/15-Mar-1993-eef) id AA14696; Thu, 29 Apr 93 20:41:12 -0700 for APPLE-IP@CAYMAN.COM
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1993 03:18:00 +0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Kuang, Fidelia" <KUANG1@applelink.apple.com>
Subject: Re:Another AT MIB+!
To: APPLE-IP@cayman.com
Message-Id: <736141271.5474269@AppleLink.Apple.COM>
Over a week ago, I suggested that we return the onHold text back to the AppleTalk MIB+ to make it easier for folks to monitor zone changing (which I know you folks are probably tired of by now...). From the relative silence, I gather than only John Norstad and maybe Tom Evans agree with this. Is this accurate? As you probably know, the latest version does not mention onHold. If you feel that onHold should be brought back, please speak up now, preferably before Karen submits the draft! Fidelia Kuang
- Re:Another AT MIB+! Kuang, Fidelia
- Re:Another AT MIB+! Robert_Jeckell