IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Requirement for "obsoletes" in Abstracts

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 05 February 2012 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E99F21F855A for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:58:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x0s-rRHK3Bfq for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:58:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B3821F8557 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:58:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sm-THINK.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q15MwAbV024676; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:58:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1328482698; i=@resistor.net; bh=V8i4sg5weWHXrz7YucnMmdbLiBgA49kRH6Xs089Uv2c=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=p3zev4P/Tw1hrC9gbuYUF9NjPuv4dUr4UUoMKjnFIzPLpdlWevjVJV/sleGxB4tTK t5Z/i0AxQW9TeZu815yBmpuwvTsX/MKgsQT7j4TQJxbcmR8gEmsSN2KOMCrmG87Kmg VVVdDz0m3b5BO6AW58F9nz/cepv80lIkG4GSYKfk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1328482698; i=@resistor.net; bh=V8i4sg5weWHXrz7YucnMmdbLiBgA49kRH6Xs089Uv2c=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=27XdGhGL2j+ihvf+lt4wqnVmHENY6reP0CMrmhrLcXB3qSKgpYG3FnRHaPi6xX70I 7jTL7fh/T20FmwteHASGvrwfxetHUigLx3TM08nYZaFPZ2I9jSQOkTDdBuxFpmV3VJ /BLAIdES+3ScGkiJaR6qBu6sVp23rOzoNzPvLR7k=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120205134413.094dff80@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:48:03 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F2E651A.2000804@gmx.de>
References: <20120204001408.16716.94710.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADBvc9_W9Jaca1TmV5QjyXupLVyLJh=6+334p-HM5pB=aKn15w@mail.gmail.com> <01OBKKTPYLIE00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <E63757FF71CD8B382B3832E7@PST.JCK.COM> <37E2E68B-23F6-4722-B7DC-444FA50D1E62@gbiv.com> <4F2E651A.2000804@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Requirement for "obsoletes" in Abstracts
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:58:28 -0000

Hi Julian,
At 03:16 AM 2/5/2012, Julian Reschke wrote:
>Is there another written rule around?

See Section 4.1.1 of 
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/rfc-style  I read it as a guideline.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email