IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Requirement for "obsoletes" in Abstracts

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 05 February 2012 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE1521F855F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:31:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKFYD3YdJaor for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A0321F852B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.11.124] ([12.239.109.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q15LVJeS090972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:31:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F2EEAA1.7060706@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:31:19 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <799720BC-AAEB-4270-BDF4-A24E83E5C553@vpnc.org>
References: <20120204001408.16716.94710.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADBvc9_W9Jaca1TmV5QjyXupLVyLJh=6+334p-HM5pB=aKn15w@mail.gmail.com> <01OBKKTPYLIE00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <E63757FF71CD8B382B3832E7@PST.JCK.COM> <CAC4RtVAWkcLT8BjLafyZN+vLwNnrnc-xtQxUd24DZgGwdC3FDg@mail.gmail.com> <4F2EEAA1.7060706@dcrocker.net>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Requirement for "obsoletes" in Abstracts
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:31:25 -0000

On Feb 5, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> I just posted a note to the RFC Editor suggesting that all this points to some benefit in reviewing and revising the RFC Style guide.


Although as John noted, this rule is actually from the IESG. Barry suggests that it might not always be enforced; I would hope that the document that John linked to (as compared to the RFC Style Guide) could be updated as well.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email