Re: [apps-discuss] draft IETF 80 minutes

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 14 April 2011 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2887E07AA for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jHLEjqnKVqGZ for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3118AE0668 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-251-69.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.251.69]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 267F440D20; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:24:44 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DA66842.3070307@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:21:38 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <4DA66102.4060200@stpeter.im> <BANLkTimL1jn2__2wf7nMwsrPB3tAN90qKg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimL1jn2__2wf7nMwsrPB3tAN90qKg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000702040003080806050202"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft IETF 80 minutes
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:21:43 -0000

On 4/13/11 9:14 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> Bernie Höneisen:
>> IANA Registration of Enumservices for Internet Calendaring
>> Session chair: Look for experts on calendaring (small group) first.
>> Question: Why shut down ENUM and not work on that there?
>> Answer: Leadership wants wg to be shut down.
> 
> More complete answer was that the WG is ending its useful life and is
> ready to be shut down, and that at this point this document is more a
> calendar issue than an enum issue, so there's little reason to do it
> in enum anyway.
> 
> Add:
> "Action: Ask Cyrus and Bernard to review and address open calendar questions."

Fixed.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/