Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00.txt

Me, too.

On 11/16/12 12:52 AM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> Yes, I volunteer to review the document.    Regards,   Martin.
> 
> On 2012/11/16 16:35, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Are the people agreeing that it should be processed in appsawg (Julian,
>> Martin, Tony, and Tim so far; hopefully others) committing to doing
>> reviews
>> if we adopt this document?  SM has already said he will.
>>
>> -MSK
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:02 PM, "Martin J. Dürst"
>> <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with APPSAWG taking it up. 3023 is really outdated, and needs to
>>> be fixed.
>>>
>>> Regards,   Martin.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2012/11/15 23:41, Tim Bray wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would support APPSAWG taking it up.  3023 is so horribly wrong, it
>>>> would
>>>> be good to have a sane replacement. -T
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Murray S.
>>>> Kucherawy<superuser@gmail.com>
>>>> **wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   So far there's been only one expression of support for processing
>>>> this
>>>>> through appsawg.  Are there any others?  Any objections to
>>>>> processing it
>>>>> here?  Other suggestions?
>>>>>
>>>>> -MSK, co-chair
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Chris Lilley<chris@w3.org>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hello apps-discuss,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-**00.txt is a restart of a proposed
>>>>>> replacement
>>>>>> for RFC3023. The previous attempt foundered because the approach
>>>>>> taken
>>>>>> required deprecation of text/xml, and the implementor community
>>>>>> was not
>>>>>> happy with that as there is much legacy content using that type that
>>>>>> still
>>>>>> has to be supported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The present draft takes advantage of recent changes in HTTP-bis which
>>>>>> removes the default charset, and so treats text/xml the same as
>>>>>> application/xml. This approach is also what most implementations
>>>>>> already
>>>>>> do, in practice. The present draft also introduces some
>>>>>> clarifications
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> fragment identifiers for xml, and updates some references.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has been suggested that this document would be a good fit for the
>>>>>> apps
>>>>>> area WG, and the editors would like to request review and adoption by
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> WG (or an alternative suggestion of where/how to handle this
>>>>>> document).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This would be a standards-track document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>    Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>>>>>>    W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
>>>>>>    Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
>>>>>>    Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/apps-discuss<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/apps-discuss<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>
>>>>>
>>>>>