Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00.txt

So far there's been only one expression of support for processing this
through appsawg.  Are there any others?  Any objections to processing it
here?  Other suggestions?

-MSK, co-chair

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> Hello apps-discuss,
>
> draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00.txt is a restart of a proposed replacement
> for RFC3023. The previous attempt foundered because the approach taken
> required deprecation of text/xml, and the implementor community was not
> happy with that as there is much legacy content using that type that still
> has to be supported.
>
> The present draft takes advantage of recent changes in HTTP-bis which
> removes the default charset, and so treats text/xml the same as
> application/xml. This approach is also what most implementations already
> do, in practice. The present draft also introduces some clarifications on
> fragment identifiers for xml, and updates some references.
>
> It has been suggested that this document would be a good fit for the apps
> area WG, and the editors would like to request review and adoption by the
> WG (or an alternative suggestion of where/how to handle this document).
>
> This would be a standards-track document.
>
> --
>  Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
>  Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>