Re: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-00.txt

Yes, I volunteer to review the document.    Regards,   Martin.

On 2012/11/16 16:35, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Are the people agreeing that it should be processed in appsawg (Julian,
> Martin, Tony, and Tim so far; hopefully others) committing to doing reviews
> if we adopt this document?  SM has already said he will.
>
> -MSK
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:02 PM, "Martin J. Dürst"
> <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote:
>
>> I agree with APPSAWG taking it up. 3023 is really outdated, and needs to
>> be fixed.
>>
>> Regards,   Martin.
>>
>>
>> On 2012/11/15 23:41, Tim Bray wrote:
>>
>>> I would support APPSAWG taking it up.  3023 is so horribly wrong, it would
>>> be good to have a sane replacement. -T
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy<superuser@gmail.com>
>>> **wrote:
>>>
>>>   So far there's been only one expression of support for processing this
>>>> through appsawg.  Are there any others?  Any objections to processing it
>>>> here?  Other suggestions?
>>>>
>>>> -MSK, co-chair
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Chris Lilley<chris@w3.org>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Hello apps-discuss,
>>>>>
>>>>> draft-lilley-xml-mediatypes-**00.txt is a restart of a proposed
>>>>> replacement
>>>>> for RFC3023. The previous attempt foundered because the approach taken
>>>>> required deprecation of text/xml, and the implementor community was not
>>>>> happy with that as there is much legacy content using that type that
>>>>> still
>>>>> has to be supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> The present draft takes advantage of recent changes in HTTP-bis which
>>>>> removes the default charset, and so treats text/xml the same as
>>>>> application/xml. This approach is also what most implementations already
>>>>> do, in practice. The present draft also introduces some clarifications
>>>>> on
>>>>> fragment identifiers for xml, and updates some references.
>>>>>
>>>>> It has been suggested that this document would be a good fit for the
>>>>> apps
>>>>> area WG, and the editors would like to request review and adoption by
>>>>> the
>>>>> WG (or an alternative suggestion of where/how to handle this document).
>>>>>
>>>>> This would be a standards-track document.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>    Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain
>>>>>    W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
>>>>>    Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
>>>>>    Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/apps-discuss<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/apps-discuss<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> apps-discuss mailing list
>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/apps-discuss<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>
>>>
>>
>